Answer:
$0.35
Explanation:
The computation of the price elasticity of demand using mid point formula is shown below:
= (change in quantity demanded ÷ average of quantity demanded) ÷ (percentage change in price ÷ average of price)
So, Change in quantity demanded would be
= Q2 - Q1
= 40 - 30
= 10
Now, Average of quantity demanded
= (40 + 30) ÷ 2
= 35
Change in price
= P2 - P1
= $35 - $15
= $20
And, the average of price would be
= ($35 + $15) ÷ 2
= $25
Cross price elasticity of demand = (10 ÷ 35) ÷ ($20 ÷ $25)
= 0.28 ÷ $0.8
= $0.35
Answer:
The correct answer is: market efficiency; government intervention; specialization; equilibrium.
Explanation:
The owner of the snow cones realizes that the demand for snow cones has decreased in winter, and thus, closes shop to open back. This is an example of market efficiency.
The local river is being polluted too much because of the amount of chemicals being dumped in the river. The government puts regulation on the amount of chemicals being dumped. This is an example of government intervention in the economy.
At a restaurant one chef is placed at the vegetable station, one chef is at meat station, and one is to plate the food. This an example of specialization the management is placing chef that specializes in vegetable, meat and in plating at their respective positions.
The favorable whether leads to increase in supply of oranges. This causes a rightward shift in supply curve. The price of oranges fall as a result. This is an example of change in equilibrium.
Answer:
The demand for 10 a.m. class is higher than the demand for the 2 p.m. class.
Explanation:
The supply of seats for the psychology class at 10 a.m is the same as the class at 2 a.m. But there is a surplus of seats at 2 a.m class and shortage of seats at 2 p.m class.
Other things being constant this implies that more students are attending the 10 a.m class than the 2 p.m. class. This shows that the demand for the 10 a.m class is comparatively higher than the demand for the 2 p.m. class.
This causes a surplus of seats at 2 p.m and shortage of seats at 10 a.m.
Answer:
The court concluded truthfully, as he had done all the analysis and acknowledged the documentation and investment purposes.
The program scammed funds which might have been used for small-income housing by the government agency.
<em>United States v. McGuire, 744 F.2d 1197 (Cir. 11, 1984).</em>
Answer:
My Answer: Why did you choose to work here? How do you feel about the organization here? What are you likes about the company? Why are working in the same organization? Would you recommend the organization for future employees?
Explanation:
Plato's Answer: I interviewed my aunt, who works at Triple J Productions. She has been working there for 20 years. When she started out, the company offered voluntary monthly trainings for employees looking to advance. The company had a family picnic every summer for employees and their families. The company was very honest, cared about its employees, customers, etc. Three years ago, the CEO passed away. His son took over the company. Now, they do not have any company picnics. Training has stopped and the company often outsources jobs to employees who will work for low salaries. She is now quite unhappy at the company, but feels that she has invested too much time in it to go somewhere else. Ten years ago, she would have said it is a great place to work. Today, she feels that the company's common practices are sneaky and underhanded and their main motivation is money.
I hope it helps!
