All categories

2 years ago

Is (

Mathematics

1 answer:

Doss [256]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

2 = 3 + 1

2=4

by knowing the first equation is not equal, we can already infer that the answer is no

You might be interested in

The answer please..:.....

Ivenika [448]

Answer:

566

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Cate and Elena were playing a card game. The stack of cards in the

Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

So you first start off with 24, then you add 8 cards and take away 12 + 9 cards, making the equation:

24 + 8 - (12 + 9)

= 32 - 21

= 11

3 0

3 years ago

In evaluating a double integral over a region D, a sum of iterated integrals was obtained as follows:

BabaBlast [244]

Answer

$a=0$ , $b=2$

$g_1(x)=\frac{5x}{2}$ , $g_2(x)=7-x$

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that

$\int \int Df(x,y)dA=\int_0 ^5\int _0 ^ {\frac {2y}{5}} f(x,y)dxdy+\int_5^7\int_0^{7-y} f(x,y)dxdy\; \cdots (i)$

For the term $\int_0 ^5\int _0 ^ {\frac {2y}{5}} f(x,y)dxdy$ .

Limits for $x$ is from $x=0$ to $x=\frac {2y}{5}$ and for $y$ is from $y=0$ to $y=5$ and the region $D$ , for this double integration is the shaded region as shown in graph 1.

Now, reverse the order of integration, first integrate with respect to $y$ then with respect to $x$ . So, the limits of $y$ become from $y=\frac{5x}{2}$ to $y=5$ and limits of $x$ become from $x=0$ to $x=2$ as shown in graph 2.

So, on reversing the order of integration, this double integration can be written as

$\int_0 ^5\int _0 ^ {\frac {2y}{5}} f(x,y)dxdy=\int_0 ^2\int _ {\frac {5x}{2}}^5 f(x,y)dydx\; \cdots (ii)$

Similarly, for the other term $\int_5 ^7\int _0 ^ {7-y} f(x,y)dxdy$ .

Limits for $x$ is from $x=0$ to $x=7-y$ and limits for $y$ is from $y=5$ to $y=7$ and the region $D$ , for this double integration is the shaded region as shown in graph 3.

Now, reverse the order of integration, first integrate with respect to $y$ then with respect to $x$ . So, the limits of $y$ become from $y=5$ to $y=7-x$ and limits of $x$ become from $x=0$ to $x=2$ as shown in graph 4.