Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Detrimental effects that occur when there is too much phosphorus added to fertilizer and ultimately ends up polluting freshwater rivers and lakes are:
1. When such fertilizers with excessive phosphorus are added to soil it leads to a decrease in the plant’s ability to contains micronutrients, such as iron and zinc
2. It also leads to a massive increase in algae and large aquatic plants in lakes or rivers.
3. There is a high tendency to have algae blooms that generate algae toxins. These toxins are considered to possess high risks to human and animal health.
A beneficiary is currently eligible for medicare part A, who enrolls into part B is called an Original Medicare beneficiary.
Usually, individuals that are eligible for part B medicare are the following:
Those collecting Social Security retirement benefits;
Those collecting Social Security disability benefits for 24 months;
Those qualified to Medicare Part A.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that a beneficiary is currently eligible for medicare part A, who enrolls into part B is called an Original Medicare beneficiary.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/10641128
Answer:
No this is false
Explanation:
The correct answer would be:
Nomads are a type of people who don't settle in one place but rather move from one area to another consistently during their entire life.
Answer:
C.S. Lewis states that moral law is not a simply convention . He says "there are two reasons for saying it belongs to the same class as mathematics. The first is, as I said in the first chapter, that though there are differences between the moral ideas of one time or country and those of another, the differences are not really very great — not nearly so great as most people imagine — [...].The other reason is this. When you think about these differences between the morality of one people and another, do you think that the morality of one people is ever better or worse than that of another? Have any of the changes been improvements? If not, then of course there could never be any moral progress. Progress means not just changing, but changing for the better. If no set of moral ideas were truer or better than any other, there would be no sense in preferring civilized morality to savage morality, or Christian morality to Nazi morality."
Then the Law of Human Nature is compared as a standard or universal truth: "he moment you say that one set of moral ideas can be better than another, you are, in fact, measuring them both by a standard, saying that one of them conforms to that standard more nearly than the other. But the standard that measures two things is something different from either. You are, in fact, comparing them both with some Real Morality, admitting that there is such a thing as a real Right, independent of what people think, and that some people's ideas get nearer to that real Right than others."
Reference: Lewis, C.S. “Some Objections .” PBS, Public Broadcasting Service, 1952
