It would be 2 since that would give you the trio mail if expanded
Answer:
17,660,000
Step-by-step explanation:
First:
Multiply 14.6 x 10^6 which equals 14,600,000.
Second:
Multiply 3.06 x 10^6 which equals 3,060,000
Third:
Add Both answers together. You will get 17,660,000 as the answer!
Answer:
(A)Decay
(b)0.8
(c)First Term
(d)
(e)$819.20
Step-by-step explanation:
The exponential function for modelling growth or decay is given as:
,
Where:
Plus indicates growth and minus indicates decay.

For a powerful computer that was purchased for $2000, but loses 20% of its value each year.
(a)Since it loses value, it is a decay.
(b)Multiplier
Its value decays by 20%.
Therefore, our multiplier(1-r) =(1-20&)=1-0.2
Multiplier =0.8
(c)$2000 is our First term (or Initial Value
)
(d)The function for this problem is therefore:

(e)Since we require the worth of the computer after 4 years,
t=4 years

An appropriate choice among these is
The graph of f is the graph of the equation y = f(x).
_____
Horizontal and vertical axes of the Cartesian plane are conventionally labeled and referred to as "x" and "y", respectively. When we talk about the graph of f(x) in that context, we usually mean the graph of y=f(x). However, this convention may not be followed in all cases. There may be no "y" label on the graph at all, or the horizontal axis may be labeled something other than "x".
Answer:
16.5 square units
Step-by-step explanation:
You are expected to integrate the function between x=1 and x=4:

__
<em>Additional comment</em>
If you're aware that the area inside a (symmetrical) parabola is 2/3 of the area of the enclosing rectangle, you can compute the desired area as follows.
The parabolic curve is 4-1 = 3 units wide between x=1 and x=4. It extends upward 2.25 units from y=4 to y=6.25, so the enclosing rectangle is 3×2.25 = 6.75 square units. 2/3 of that area is (2/3)(6.75) = 4.5 square units.
This region sits on top of a rectangle 3 units wide and 4 units high, so the total area under the parabolic curve is ...
area = 4.5 +3×4 = 16.5 . . . square units