They are expressing "differential association".
Differential association, in criminology is a hypothesis created by Edwin Sutherland recommending that through interacting with others, people take in the qualities, dispositions, methods, and thought processes in criminal conduct. The differential association is the most discussed of the learning theories of deviance. This hypothesis centers around how people figure out how to end up wrongdoers, yet does not worry about why they move toward becoming offenders.
<span>a. few govt regulations of business</span>
Answer: Steve is experiencing evaluation apprehension
Explanation: Since Steve was playing for his high school team for the first time, he knew that others would be watching and evaluating his game, and among those watching him were coaches, therefore, on whom his future playing on the team depends. Based on the coach's judgement, it depends on whether Steve will play the next game, etc., which means a reward / penalty concept based on what others think of Steve. This means that during the game, Steve has been thinking about what others think of him that causes arousal, and that arousal can improve or diminish our work, in Steve's case was that this excitement diminished his performance in the match.
It means that when we work in the presence of others who are watching over us, we think like Steve, what do they think about our work and that can improve or diminish our performance, so we have experienced <em>evaluation apprehension.</em>
The answer to your question is True. The supreme court can rule certain laws unconstitutional through cases.
