The merits of electing versus appointing particular officials are widely debated, the people who debates them and support the elected positions state that the elections for a position ensure them transparency in the process and that the people elected is well know for the votants and that gives them a sense that their needs and desires, as citizens will be fullfiled, on the other hand the people that support the appointed positions state that, the elections are deprioritizes the required quantitative skills and encourages bureaucratic cronyism, they believe that the people that is appointed has the needed skills and will fullfil the people's needs.
<em>The Sibley Commission was formed in Georgia in response to the Supreme Court ruling of Brown vs. Board of Education. The purpose of the Sibley Committe was to ;</em>
D. Decide if desegregation was constitutional in Georgia
<u>The Brown vs. Board of Education is the Court that would declare state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students to be unconstitutional. </u>
<u>This was my original thought that the answer would be, however, The Sibley Commission was created to survey on whether or not to integrate schools. Which leaves me thinking the answer might most likely be answer choice A as well.</u>
A. Determine if Georgians wanted to integrate schools
<u>Georgians would rather see schools closed that integrated. These lawsuits were combined into the landmark Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court case that outlawed segregation in schools. </u>
Answer choice A seems about correct.
The Senate has the sole power to conduct impeachment trials, essentially serving as jury and judge.
