Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
- So profit is denoted by Y
- Selling price is denoted by X
Hencd we have Y= X + B
Where Be can be a constant for example how much he already sold or etc.
Rate positively and give brainlist
Given:
Price of tickets:
3 years ago - 8.75
now - 11
annual multiplier:
b³ = 11/8.75
b = ∛11/8.75
b = 1.079
The annual multiplier is 1.079.
1.079 * 100% = 107.9%
107.9% - 100% = 7.9%
The percentage increase is 7.9%
Increasing. It helps to graph it out.
