The available options are the following:
-Board members serve on multiple boards
-People with knowledge of the firm's history are replaced with those who may not know as much information
-Less frequent board meetings
-Better decisions about important issues
Answer:
-People with knowledge of the firm's history are replaced with those who may not know as much information
Explanation:
Considering the available options, the option that appears negative and related to the point being discussed is
"People with knowledge of the firm's history are replaced with those who may not know as much information."
It is straightforward, as changing the board of directors will at some point lead to a time where the new member in the board of directors will just be a competent worker but has no history with the company.
Answer:
Explanation:
You need to assume that the total <em>expenses</em> were equal to the<em> cost of the supplies</em>, i.e. there were not other expenses but the<em> $1,500 for supplies to sell.</em>
The total income or revenue was <em>$3,700</em>.
The <em>percentage of the expenses to the revenue</em> is:
Answer:
$6910.70
Explanation:
At the end of each year, the account balance will be 1.05 times the value at the beginning of the year. Thus, at the end of year 3, the value is 1.05^3 times the original value.
$8000 = (deposit)×1.05^3
deposit = $8000/1.05^3 ≈ $6910.70
James should deposit $6910.70 today.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. Marpor's value without leverage is
But before that first we have to calculate the required rate of return which is
The Required rate of return = Risk Free rate of return + Beta × market risk premium
= 5% + 1.1 × (15% - 5%)
= 16%
Now without leverage is
= Free cash flows generates ÷ required rate of return
= $16,000,000 ÷ 16%
= $100,000,000
b. And, with the new leverage is
= (Free cash flows with debt ÷ required rate of return) + (Tax rate × increase of debt)
= ($15,000,000 ÷ 0.16) + (0.35 × $40,000,000)
= $93,750,000 + $14,000,000
= $107,750,000
Answer:
The firm should shut down the production.
Explanation:
The given marginal costs = $25
Fixed cost of the production = $5000
The price of producing the 50 units of meals = $10
The new price of the meal when demand goes up = $20
Since it can be seen that the price of the meal is lower than the average cost or even it is less than the marginal cost. So, when the prices are lower than average cost then a firm should shut down the production because after shutting down the production the loss will be equal to the fixed cost only.
So, the firm should shut down the production.
