The answer is "the social-conflict approach".
The social conflict approach is a way to deal with social theory that contends that society is described by different disparities and clashes that reason individuals to act socially, delivering change.
Society, according to the social conflict approach, isn't amicable. It's not steady. Society doesn't create agreeable balance. Truth be told, it's overflowing with imbalance. So this methodology is extremely about investigating imbalances of race, class, sexual orientation, and ethnicity, and the social clashes which result. Basically, these contentions will result in change, changes that will move society.
civil rights are granted by governments to ensure civil liberties
without the civil rights, basically all civilians will live without any liberties because the governments will have too much power over their people. Without civil rights, if you're a hindrance for the government, they could easily just kill you like in North Korea
Answer:
mechanical solidarity
Explanation:
Mechanical solidarity was developed in Emile Durkheim theory if development of society. Durkheim explains that mechanical solidarity is seen in less technologically developed societies or hunting and gathering societies whereby there is togetherness as a result of shared beliefs, customs, traditions or experiences. This solidarity functions like some sort of internal conscience among 10th else individuals that causes cooperation among them. Mechanical solidarity is opposed to organic solidarity in Durkheim's theory.
B. They ruled that segregation was legal as long as the 'separate but equal' factor applied :)<span />
A.) They increased the personal freedoms of enslaved African Americans
