Answer:
HEEFF
Explanation:
This explains the wider implications of the text better than AFOREST or LOD.
I think the answer is C but that’s just a guess
Indeed cities should be required to have detailed evacuation plans
> We cannot provide specific textual evidence because you forgot to attach the passage. However, we can comment on the following.
> Every city should have a very thought-out plan to evacuate the citizens in case of a natural disaster.
> In the absence of this plan, citizens are at the mercy of luck, and that is no good.
> Every local and state government should foster the culture of prevention instead of only reacting when the problem has arisen.
> Natural disasters did not warn you. They hit a city and if people are not prepared to act, what follows is panic and chaos.
We can conclude that every city should create the proper evacuation plan and have simulacrums or rehearsals so people could know how to act in order to prevent tragedies.
Learn more about this topic here:
brainly.com/question/10063889?referrer=searchResults
Distract you from reading the book so you don’t get the full concept of the book
