When applying indirect proofs, we assume the negation of the conclusion is true, and show that this assumption would lead to nonsense, or contradiction.
In our case we assume a is not smaller than 7, that is we assume a≥7.
a≥7 then, multiplying both sides by 3:
3a≥21, then, adding both sides 7:
3a+7≥28,
which is a contradiction because 3a+7 is smaller than 28.
So our assumption is wrong, which means the opposite of it is correct.
Answer: assume a≥7
Answer:
2 minutes ago Suppose a long term investment is modeled by the exponential fuction V(t)= 30(25) ^t/20 where V(t) is the total value after t year 5 minutes ago
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:My answer is Temp-pH I
I don't know if it is right or not
Answer:
1. MIGHT be 16 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
causse 2/3 / 4/9 = 1 1/2
1 1/2 + 10= 11 +5 = 16
16+1/2 = 16 1/2
