Answer:
$2681.30 approx.
Explanation:
The first annuity is case of annuity due
For the first annuity, $2500 + 2500 × cumulative present value factor at 7.25% for 14 years
= $2500 + 8.6158 × 2500
= $24040 approx
The second annuity is the case of deferred annuity wherein payments are made at the end of the year.
Payment amount of second annuity = Present Value of first annuity ÷ cumulative present value annuity factor at 7.25% for 15 years
This will be equal to 24,040/8.9658 = $2681.30 approx.
Answer:
9.68%
Explanation:
yield to maturity (YTM) = {coupon + [(face value - market value) / n]} / [(face value + market value) / 2]
face value = $1,000
market value = $1,000 x 0.98 = $980
n = (13 - 2) x 2 = 22
coupon = $1,000 x 0.094 x 1/2 = $47
YTM = {$47 + [($1,000 - $980) / 22]} / [($1,000 + $980) / 2] = $47.9090 / $990 = 0.4839 x 2 (annual rate) = 0.09678 = 9.68%
If the new hires had not been adequately trained to make use of the system. This is an example of fundamental attribution bias.
<h3>What is fundamental attribution bias?</h3>
Fundamental attribution bias can be defined as the way in which a person judge another person without considering the situation factors.
Based on the giveing scenario Paulina is using fundamental attribution bias on the new employ by ignoring the reason why the new hire did not use the company's expert software system.
Therefore this is an example of fundamental attribution bias.
Learn more about fundamental attribution bias here:brainly.com/question/17109470
Answer:
Predatory pricing.
Explanation:
Predatory pricing is a strategy that is used by firms to gain customers, create barrier of entry from a market, or to drive competition out of the market. The firm prices it's products very low so that competitors cannot afford to sell at the same price.
This results in competitors going out of business. The result of predatory pricing is that there are few firms left in the industry, or there is establishment of a monopoly.
