A law which was created in order to directly protect consumers is: B. product safety laws.
<h3>What is a product?</h3>
A product can be defined as any physical object (tangible item) that is typically produced by a manufacturer so as to satisfy and meet the demands, needs or wants of every customer. Some examples of a product include the following:
- Mobile phones or Smartphones
- Television
- Microwave oven
- Pencil
- Refrigerator
- Computer
- Shampoo
<h3>What are
product safety laws?</h3>
Product safety laws can be defined as a set of law that were primarily enacted under the Consumer Product Safety Act of 1972, so as to regulate most of the processes and individuals that are either directly or indirectly involved in the creation of a consumer product.
In this context, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce that a law which was created in order to directly protect consumers is product safety laws.
Read more on product safety laws here: brainly.com/question/18215744
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Which of these laws was created in order to directly protect consumers?
pollution laws
product safety laws
wage laws
equal opportunity laws
The United States has the largest Christian population in the world, followed by Brazil, Mexico, Russia, and the Philippines.
Answer:The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be option D. CONTROL OF TERRITORY. During the Hundred Years' War, monarchies fought over a throne and control of territory. The Hundred Years' War was fought from 1337-1453 and it lasted 116 years. Hope this answers your question.
Explanation:The correct answer is D. During the Hundred Years War, monarchies of England and France fought over a throne and for the control of territory.The purpose of the War was to decide who would control the enormous possessions accumulated by the English monarchs since 1154 in French territories, due to the accession to the English throne of Henry II Plantagenet, Count of Anjou. It ended with the English withdrawal of French lands.
<span>Since the decision of the
Speaker of the House, John William McCormack, was to ask the high
chamber member Adam Clayton Powell Jr. not to take an oath, because of
the previous scandal in which Powell had been involved; If
the jury had decided in favor of Speaker McCormack, the way of operating
in the congress would have been questioned, since only one member could
be expelled according to what the constitution says, and not by the
decisions of the speaker. <span>The scope would have been very
large if it failed in McCormack's favor, giving a sense of illegality or
favoritism, and voters would feel that their representatives were not
respected.</span></span>
A. would be the correct answer
