The primary thrust of the original intent and wording of the tenth amendment is that states have certain powers that the national gov't cannot get over upon.
This 10th amendment deals with the ability to limit the powers of the federal government by reserving those particular powers to the states and to the people also.
The Amendment was intended to confirm the understanding of the people at the time when the Constitution was adopted by the government, where the powers not granted to the federal government were reserved to particular states or to its people. The amendment also states in the truism that all is retained which on the other hand has not been surrendered.
There is nothing that exists in the history of its adoption to suggest that it was more than the declaration of the relationship between the national as well as state government as it had already been established by the Constitution before the purpose of amendment and of that its purpose was other than to devote fears that the new government policy might get to exercise powers which is not to be granted, and that of the states might not be able to exercise their respected reserved powers fully.
In general, the state will have certain power as the national federal govt cannot cross upon its powers which were declared as the primary thrust of the intent which is original.
Learn to know more about the powers according to the 10th amendment on
brainly.com/question/24908771
#SPJ4
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
Although I dont exactly have the passage I can use fact. Military spending jumped exponentially after 9/11 and especially with the launch of Operation Enduring Freedom. Also, more people joined the military at this time. 9/11 also has historically been seen as a day of unity in the United States, and was a day when people of all groups and races came together to take a stance against terror. In the longer run, we have maintained presence in Southeast Asian countries, and we continue to spend around $600 billion in military spending. Hope this helps!
<span>Miner found that the appearance and health of their bodies loomed largest as a dominant concern in the ethos of the nacirema.</span>
Answer:
This is an example of social interaction
Explanation:
Social interaction is considered to be the building block of a society. It is the exchange of thoughts between two or more individuals. There are positive affects of social interaction on human beings. It develops a positive growth in human behavior and makes people confident of their existence. It is the ways people relate to each other.
People try to relate with each other when they interact with each other.
In the context, when a prostitute is smiling at the potential customers and exhibiting her attributes, she is trying to interact with different people as they pass by. They are a sign of social interaction by such acts of the prostitute.
Hence the answer is ---
This is an example of social interaction
