All categories

2 years ago

If m = 2, find the value of m+3.

Mathematics

2 answers:

Natasha2012 [34]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

m+3=

(m=2)+3=

(2)+3=

2+3=

steposvetlana [31]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

Reese is selling lemonade at the parade. He gets to keep 50% of the money he collects. A large lemonade is $6.00 and a small lem

yuradex [85]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given data

We are given that

Large lemonade= $6

Small lemonade= $4

Total amount = 6+4= $10

He keeps 50% of the total

= 50/100*10

=0.5*10

= $5

Hence he will keep $5

8 0

2 years ago

Which of the following is figure are complementary

Murrr4er [49]

Options 1, 2, and 3 (:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Lagrange multipliers have a definite meaning in load balancing for electric network problems. Consider the generators that can o

Ivahew [28]

Answer:

The load balance $(x_1,x_2,x_3)=(545.5,272.7,181.8)$ Mw minimizes the total cost

Step-by-step explanation:

Optimizing With Lagrange Multipliers

When a multivariable function f is to be maximized or minimized, the Lagrange multipliers method is a pretty common and easy tool to apply when the restrictions are in the form of equalities.

Consider three generators that can output xi megawatts, with i ranging from 1 to 3. The set of unknown variables is x1, x2, x3.

The cost of each generator is given by the formula

$\displaystyle C_i=3x_i+\frac{i}{40}x_i^2$

It means the cost for each generator is expanded as

$\displaystyle C_1=3x_1+\frac{1}{40}x_1^2$

$\displaystyle C_2=3x_2+\frac{2}{40}x_2^2$

$\displaystyle C_3=3x_3+\frac{3}{40}x_3^2$

The total cost of production is

$\displaystyle C(x_1,x_2,x_3)=3x_1+\frac{1}{40}x_1^2+3x_2+\frac{2}{40}x_2^2+3x_3+\frac{3}{40}x_3^2$

Simplifying and rearranging, we have the objective function to minimize:

$\displaystyle C(x_1,x_2,x_3)=3(x_1+x_2+x_3)+\frac{1}{40}(x_1^2+2x_2^2+3x_3^2)$

The restriction can be modeled as a function g(x)=0:

$g: x_1+x_2+x_3=1000$

$g(x_1,x_2,x_3)= x_1+x_2+x_3-1000$

We now construct the auxiliary function

$f(x_1,x_2,x_3)=C(x_1,x_2,x_3)-\lambda g(x_1,x_2,x_3)$

$\displaystyle f(x_1,x_2,x_3)=3(x_1+x_2+x_3)+\frac{1}{40}(x_1^2+2x_2^2+3x_3^2)-\lambda (x_1+x_2+x_3-1000)$

We find all the partial derivatives of f and equate them to 0

$\displaystyle f_{x1}=3+\frac{2}{40}x_1-\lambda=0$

$\displaystyle f_{x2}=3+\frac{4}{40}x_2-\lambda=0$

$\displaystyle f_{x3}=3+\frac{6}{40}x_3-\lambda=0$

$f_\lambda=x_1+x_2+x_3-1000=0$

Solving for \lambda in the three first equations, we have

$\displaystyle \lambda=3+\frac{2}{40}x_1$

$\displaystyle \lambda=3+\frac{4}{40}x_2$

$\displaystyle \lambda=3+\frac{6}{40}x_3$

Equating them, we find:

$x_1=3x_3$

$\displaystyle x_2=\frac{3}{2}x_3$

Replacing into the restriction (or the fourth derivative)

$x_1+x_2+x_3-1000=0$

$\displaystyle 3x_3+\frac{3}{2}x_3+x_3-1000=0$

$\displaystyle \frac{11}{2}x_3=1000$

$x_3=181.8\ MW$

And also

$x_1=545.5\ MW$

$x_2=272.7\ MW$

The load balance $(x_1,x_2,x_3)=(545.5,272.7,181.8)$ Mw minimizes the total cost

5 0

3 years ago

Please help meeeeee thanksss

Alex

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

it's 3 hmmm it tells you rise over run.. just about where they are asking for the answer.. what do you not get about the question?

3 0

3 years ago

Find g. (-9) g(+)= r^2 + 3r

oee [108]

Answer:

g(-9) = 64

Step-by-step explanation:

Given function:

g(r) = r² + 3r

Find g(-9):

g(-9) = (-9)² + 3(-9) = 81 - 27 = 64

7 0

2 years ago