Answer:
c
Step-by-step explanation:
d=2r=2X3=6
Since there are two events happening simultaneously (windy and no sun), we can apply the concept of conditional probability here.
P(A|B) = P(A∩B)/P(B)
where it means that given B is happening, the probability that A is happening as well is the ratio of the chance for A and B to happen simultaneously over the chance of B to happen.
For our case, this can be interpreted as
P(A|B): it is the probability that it is windy (A) GIVEN that there is no sun (B)
P(A∩B) : chance of wind and no sun
P(B) : chance that there is no sun tomorrow
The chance of P(A∩B) is already given as 20% or 0.20. Since there is 10% or 0.10 chance of sun, then chances of having no sun tomorrow is (1-0.10) = 0.90.
Thus, we have P(A|B) = 0.2/0.9 ≈ 0.22 or 22%.
So, answer is B: 22%<span>.</span>
Answer:
160/147
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The requirements for the hypothesis test does satisfied the method for testing the claim that from two population proportions the rate of polio is less for children given the salk vaccine.
Step-by-step explanation:
The percentage of children in the treatment group was:
(201229/401974)*100 = 49.9%
The percentage of children given placebo was:
(200745/401974)*100 = 50.1%
The percentage of children that developed polio in the treatment group:
(33/200745)*100 = 0.0164%
The percentage of children that developed polio in the placebo group:
(115/201229)*100 = 0.0571%
The percentage difference between the two group:
((0.0571-0.0164)/0.0571) = 61.62%
Therefore:
The amount of children used for each group was almost divided into half of the total amount of children. The test revealed although very small percentages of the both group developed polio, 68.62% more children given placebo than the children that was given the salk vaccine. Therefore, the study shows that the rate of polio is less for children given the salk vaccine and the the hypthesis test is satisfied.
Answer:
54 hope this helps
Step-by-step explanation:
