Flow most likely arises when one's activity entails a balanced ratio of A) skills to challenges, I believe.
Americans wanted to make George Washington president because he was a war hero, and they wanted to have someone trustworthy as president. George Washington helped win the war, and that proved that he was trustworthy.
Well, it's not because positive parenting is positive and negative parenting is negative. Here's why:
1. Positive parenting represents parents giving their children choices to help them understand what is good for them in life.
2. Negative parenting represents parents who wants to take control over their children, meaning they're forcing the child(or children) to do the things that the parents want to do.
Most parents tell their children what they're supposed to do and what they're not supposed to do. It's a very important thing because it helps give children a better understanding about things that would keep them safe and the things that could put them in danger (or trouble).
<span>
Positive parenting is the most effective, meaning successful, because it would help people understand that keeping their children safe and telling them things that is right and wrong is the best way to show yourself that you are a good parent and that you're showing love and respect towards your kids.</span>
Answer:
CEO duality results in improved leadership efficiency and effectiveness
Explanation:
Unity of command school of thought holds the position that a subordinate reports/answers to only one supervisor, who in turn is responsible to only one supervisor, and in that order all the way up the organizational hierarchy regardless of whether the top management of the organization is led by a group of people. Unity of Command school of thought does not support CEO duality.
Answer:
A. the Clayton Act.
Explanation:
The source of today's antitrust laws is the Sherman Act, the American Antitrust Law of July 2, 1890, supplemented later by the Clayton Act of 1914, and the Law that created the Federal Trade Commission the same year, the american antitrust agency.
Some authors claim that the Sherman Act was designed to protect the market itself, which would be self-destructing due to excessive economic freedom. It is even argued that the American antitrust law represented a supposed salvation from liberalism, which, without regulation, would give rise to monopolistic concentrations that distorted the natural rules of competition.
