Answer:
Modernism --> Education
Traditional Religion --> Literal interpretation of the Bible
Explanation:
No, the <span>colonists were not treated like slaves during this time, since they had far more rights than slaves. Although they were having their rights impeded due to the fact that the British did not allow them to have any representation in Parliament. </span>
Answer:
OD
Explanation:
This was a conflict between them because both europeans and native americans had to use the land. Europeans abused their power so they can get the land
“One of the strangest controversies in the history of Orientalism turned upon the “origin of bhakti”, as if devotion had at some given moment been a new idea and thenceforth a fashionable one. It would have been simpler to observe that the word bhakti means primarily a given share, and therefore also the devotion or love that all liberality presupposes; and so that inasmuch as one “gives God his share” (bhagam), i.e. sacrifces, one is his bhakta. Thus in the hymn, “If thou givest me my share” amounts to saying “If thou lovest me”. It has often been pointed out that the Sacrifice was thought of as a commerce between Gods and men: but not often realised that by introducing into traditional conceptions of trade notions derived from our own internecine commercial transactions, we have falsified our understanding of the original sense of such a commerce, which was actually more of the potlatsh type, a competition in giving, than like our competitions in taking.
The statement "Archeologists study the remains of ancient humans as well as artifacts" is true.
Hope this helps :)
