Answer:
Federalist Paper 84 argued that the Constitution didn’t need one immediately, but amendments could be added later. Read more about the question “why do we need the Bill of Rights” and Federalist 84. Federalist 84 Addresses Objections. One of the primary objections to the Constitution was that it contained no bill of rights. The Federalist ...
Explanation:
My opinion is that it is every women’s choice to decide what they want to do with their body / life
<span>Well, the most immediate contextual change is the setting itself: from Spain to the United States. Both have diverse terrains, but the connected-ness of the USA (via highways/interstates) would allow for a differently paced story. Additionally, the "resurrection of chivalry" would be replaced with some other revival movement to a "simpler time" and its ethics. To be fair, that notion is already prevalent among many conservatives and anti-progressives. The discourses between new Quixote and Panza would likely be as fire-y as recent Presidential debates, stoked in populist ideals and failed promises from those recent agents of change to society as a whole. Overall, it would be an interesting take on an old classic, and likely prompt serious discussion about our romanticizing of the past.</span>
<span>The abbreviations after a word in the dictionary tell you its part of speech or grammatical class, for example, whether it is a noun, verb, adjective and so on. </span>
