Answer:
Conclusion
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean for EBR is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81ccd/81ccd12946120d6a957449cf52a109cb97d594fa" alt="\mu_ 1 = \$239,000"
The sample mean for Ascension parish is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0137d/0137d80aaeff064f523ca37dc167f39732494063" alt="\= x_2 = \$246,000"
The p-value is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f116/0f116e7b13e60c4b6d93b92644247c8c2e1e97f3" alt="p-value = 0.045"
The level of significance is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40343/4034370b517f80a736edc22d636ba17d41655137" alt="\alpha = 0.01"
The null hypothesis is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d471/6d4716a8ac84ea5475f0c88b414b5b1b24472514" alt="H_o : \mu_2 = \mu_1"
The alternative hypothesis is data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c95f/6c95f534b68df6286e84d2929f3d35a837ba6e90" alt="H_a : \mu_2 > \mu_1"
Here
is the population mean for Ascension parish
From the data given values we see that
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e70ff/e70ff5c6dd3ae54589293d779fad78f6a6a49dd3" alt="p-value > \alpha"
So we fail to reject the null hypothesis
So we conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Tan(ANGLE) = Opposite Leg / Adjacent Leg
Tan(60) = Y/8
Y = 8 x tan(60)
Y = 8√3
Y = 13.9
The y function
hope this helps
Set up a system of equations.
d + q = 75
.1d + .25q = 14.25
Multiply the first equation by -.1 so that the "d's" will cancel.
-.1d -.1q = -7.5
.1d +.25q = 14.25
Now add the two equations together
.15q = 6.75
divide both sides by .15
q = 45
There are 45 quarters in the jar
Answer:
(9x, 9y) dilation
Step-by-step explanation:
(9, 9y) is the answer because F is 180 degrees rotations, G is not real, H is translations, and J is dilations and dilations is multiplying which makes the transformation non congruent.
Your welcome