2l + 2w = P
l = 35, P = 84, w=?
2*35 + 2*w = 84
70 + 2w = 84
2w = 84 - 70
2w = 14
w = 14/2
w = 7 in
Answer:
Yes there is sufficient evidence.
Null hypothesis; H_o ; μ = 445
Alternative hypothesis; H_o ; μ ≠ 445
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis states that there is no difference in the test which is denoted by H_o. However, the sign of null hypothesis is denoted by the signs of = or ≥ or ≤.
Meanwhile, the alternative hypothesis is one that defers from the null hypothesis. This therefore implies a significant difference in the test. Thus, the signs of alternative hypothesis is denoted by; < or > or ≠.
Now, the question we have is a two tailed test. Thus;
The null hypothesis is;
bag filling machine works correctly at the 445 gram setting which is;
H_o ; μ = 445
The alternative hypothesis is;
bag filling machine works incorrectly at the 445 gram setting which is;
H_o ; μ ≠ 445
Option A:
I and III only the answers.
Solution:
Let white vases be "w" and red vases be "r".
Cost of total flower = $336
Cost of each vase = $11
Total cost of the centerpieces
= Cost of (white vases + red vases) + Cost of flowers
= 11(w + r) + 336
= 11w + 11r + 336
Total cost of the centerpieces = 11w + 11r + 336 = 11(w + r) + 336
Therefore I and III only the answers.
Option A is the correct answer.
I don’t understand what the question is telling me
Answer:
21
Step-by-step explanation:
Use PEMDAS.
6*3=18
18/3=6
22+5=27
27-6=21
