All categories

2 years ago

Which of the following items would MOST likely be enforced by the forced sale of a property?

1 answer:

4 0

A property is a belong of any person. The items would most likely be enforced by the forced sale of a property is judgment.

<h3>How are judgments been enforced? </h3>

In terms of wages, a judgment creditor uses authorization from the court in a document. Due to this authorization, the judgment creditor directs the police to seize a portion of your wages. The police, in turn, notifies the person involved.

This is the same when it comes to property. A judgement by a court often stands in the sales of any property.

Learn more about Property from

brainly.com/question/26136315

You might be interested in

Compare the rate of human development in the different provinces in south africa

elena-s [515]

Human development varies widely across the provinces of South Africa. Western Cape has the highest score of HDI of approximately 0.77, while Limpopo to the northern border has the lowest around 0.59. Only four provinces, Western Cape, Gauteng, Northern Cape, and free State are above the national average HDI of 0.66. Mpumalanga, KwaZulu-Natal, Eastern Cape, Cape West, and Limpopo have below average scores.

8 0

3 years ago

Veronica Mars, a recent graduate of Bell’s accounting program, evaluated the operating performance of Dunn Company’s six divisio

Nat2105 [25]

You expect me to answer this

3 0

3 years ago

In 2019, selected automobiles had an average cost of $12,000. the average cost of those same automobiles is now $13,200. what wa

maksim [4K]

The rate of increase for these automobiles between the two time periods is 10%

<h3>What is automobiles?</h3>

Automobile is the wheeled vehicle usually having four wheels and generally used for the transportation purposes. For example :- car, buses, trucks, bike etc.

In the above case, the average cost of the automobile is $12000 in 2009 but now it has increased to $ 13200. For the calculation of the increased rate of the auto mobile following formula is used as follows:-

Increased rate = (current value -Initial value )/current value * 100

=( $13,200 - $12,000)/ $12,000 *100

=$1200/ 12000 *100

= 10%

Therefore, the rate of the increase for these automobile between 2 periods is 10%.

Learn more about increase rate here:

brainly.com/question/20820218

#SPJ1

5 0

2 years ago

Martinez Corp. has the following beginning-of-the-year present values for its projected benefit obligation and market-related va

Reptile [31]

Answer:

2020 $11,700

2021 $8,080

2022 $14,040

Explanation:

PBO = Projected benefit Obligation

PA = Plan Asset

Acc. OCI = Accumulated OCI Gain / Loss

Min. Amort loss = Minimum Amortization of Loss

Year : PBO ; PA ; Corridor 10% ; Acc. OCI ; Min. Amort loss

2019 : $2,340,000 ; $2,223,000 ; $234,000

2020 : $2,808,000 ; $2,925,000 ; $280,800 ; $397,800 ; 11,700

2021 : $3,451,500 ; $3,042,000 ; $345,150 ; $264,350 ; 8,080

2022 : $4,212,000 ; $3,510,000 ; $421,200 ; $280,800 ; 14,040

6 0

3 years ago

Suppose that you were the manager of a large retail store that was currently experiencing a shoplifting problem. Every hour, app

Soloha48 [4]

<u>Answer: </u>

Benefits are amplified at a point where the minor income efficiency (MRP) is equivalent to the expense of employing a security watch. In this way, a benefit expanding firm will enlist as long as the MRP is more noteworthy than the wages or the expense of recruiting a security monitor.

On the off chance that I need to amplify benefit, at that point I won't enlist the security monitor at a compensation pace of $20 in light of the fact that the expense of recruiting is more noteworthy than the expansion to the complete income or MRP, which is equivalent to $15 (expecting that the security watchman will kill shoplifting).

The above examination shows that a security watchman will be paid a compensation rate for every hour, which is equivalent to the sum spared every hour by the security monitor for wiping out the normal shoplifting every hour.

The sum spared is an expansion to the all out income, and no benefit boosting firm would pay a compensation rate higher than the augmentations to the complete income.

8 0

3 years ago