I’m not 100% sure, but I think the answer is your third option
In the "principal deposit" of the temple of Nekhen they found important ceremonial Proto dynastic artifacts such as the Narmer Palette and the famous mace head bearing the name of King Scorpion. Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
Saudi Arabia's government is an <u>autocratic monarchy</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Autocracy is a form of government in which the nation is controlled and ruled by only one person. History says that Adolf Hitler is an autocrat.
Monarchy is a form of government in which one person takes the power of ruling by heredity and rules the nation. Queen Elizabeth II is a monarch.
Some of the countries that follow autocratic monarchy are Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar, Brunei and Eswatini.
If an individual proves himself as a dictator and overthrows the existing government, he/she can get a chance to be the autocratic leader.
Hobbes was a supporter of absolute monarchy, which gave a single person total power over the government and exempted the king from all checks and balances. On the other side, Locke endorsed a more liberal strategy for creating states.
What do the John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories of the social contract have in common?
Both Locke and Hobbes saw the social compact as being crucial to the political stability of a state. But each of these ideas was based on a very different understanding of human nature.
Why was Locke's viewpoint so much different than Hobbes?
The natural rules revealed by Locke exist in the state of nature, in opposition to Hobbes. Additionally, they are regarded as fundamental aspects of human nature since they violate people's right to personal freedom. A state of conflict is not the same as a state of nature.
Learn more about John Locke and Thomas Hobbes theories: brainly.com/question/1596903
#SPJ4
