It has significantly decreased
Answer and Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
1)
Fair value per share = $20.4
Number of Share = 2 million
Fair value of award = Fair value per share ×Number of Share
= $20.4 × 2 million
= $40.8 million
2) No Entry
3)
Compensation expense($40.8 million÷4 years) $10.2 million
To Paid in capital - restricted stock($20.4-$10.2) $10.2 million
(Being the compensation expense is recorded)
4)
Fair value per share = $20.4
Share granted = 2 million
(100%-10%) forfeiture rate = 90%
fair value of award = $20.4×2×90%
= $36.72 million
Answer:
b) high in rich countries.
Explanation:
Capital-to- labour ratio measure the degree of capitalisation of an economy.
Labour is the service that is given by workers in exchange for salaries in the production process.
Capital is the long term input that is put into the manufacturing process, usually in the form of machinery or systems that automate production.
Capital-to-labour ratio= Total capital/ Total labour
Rich countries have a high level of capitalisation of their production process, where a lot of activity is automated. So capital is high and labour input is low. This results in a high capital-to-labour ratio.
On the other hand poor countries are more labour inensive, so their capital-to-labour ratio is low.
Answer:
d. Cost cutting in one area of the value chain might increase costs in another.
Explanation:
Although cost leadership is an efficient way to dominate the competition,it does have potential pitfalls if not executed correctly. For example, if operating cost is decreased, the changed product feature may imply a higher marketing cost afterward. In order to be truly efficient, the cost leadership strategy has to be implemented in such a way, so it doesn't impact other value chain costs negatively (increasing them).
Answer:
Total Revenues would increase because Demand is Inelastic
Explanation:
Demand is buyers ability & willingness to buy at a given price, time.
Elasticity of Demand is quantity demanded responsiveness to price change.
More Elastic Demand means quantity demanded responds highly to change in price. Percentage Change in Quantity Demanded > Percentage Change in Price. Elasticity of Demand [Δ%Q / Δ%P] >1 in this case. Price and Total Revenue (PxQ) are inversely related in this case ; i.e - price rise, TR fall & price fall, TR rise.
Less Elastic Demand means quantity demanded responds less to change in price. Percentage Change in Quantity Demanded < Percentage Change in Price. Elasticity of Demand [Δ%Q / Δ%P] < 1 in this case. Price and Total Revenue (PxQ) are positively related in this case ; i.e - price rise, TR rise & price fall, TR fall.
So: If Sam's Pint price change by 20% leads to demand fall by 4%, the demand is less elastic i.e < 1. Hence, Total Revenue will increase with increase in price.
