Step-by-step explanation:
Let's call L the length and W the width. The length is 10 feet longer than the width, so:
L = W + 10
The area is the length times width, so:
119 = LW
Substituting:
119 = (W + 10) W
119 = W² + 10W
0 = W² + 10W − 119
0 = (W + 17) (W − 7)
W = -17 or 7
Since W must be positive, W = 7.
L = W + 10
L = 17
The length and width are 17 feet and 7 feet, respectively.
Answer:
Option D The solution of the system is the point (-3,5)
Step-by-step explanation:
we have
x+y=2 -----> equation A
y=-2x-1 ------> equation B
Solve the system by substitution
Substitute the equation B in equation A and solve for x
x+(-2x-1)=2
-x-1=2
x=-2-1
x=-3
Find the value of y
y=-2x-1
y=-2(-3)-1
y=5
therefore
The solution of the system is the point (-3,5)
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.
Answer:
the answer is 3 1/2 hours
Step-by-step explanation:
203/58=3.5
Answer:
5
Step-by-step explanation:
because by solving that the answer comes 5.70