1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
swat32
2 years ago
9

The Allen, Bevell, and Carter partnership began the process of liquidation with the following balance sheet: Cash $ 25,000 Liabi

lities $ 175,000 Noncash assets 500,000 Allen, capital 90,000 Bevell, capital 100,000 Carter, capital 160,000 Total $ 525,000 Total $ 525,000 Allen, Bevell, and Carter share profits and losses in a ratio of 3:2:5. Liquidation expenses are expected to be $14,000. If the noncash assets were sold for $275,000, what amount of the loss would have been allocated to Bevell with respect to the noncash assets
Business
1 answer:
sleet_krkn [62]2 years ago
7 0

The amount of the loss from the sale of non-cash assets that would have been allocated to Bevell is $45,000.

Data and Calculations:

Allen, Bevell, and Carter Partnership Balance Sheet

Cash                   $ 25,000          Liabilities                  $ 175,000

Noncash assets 500,000          Allen, capital                 90,000

                                                    Bevell, capital             100,000

                                                    Carter, capital             160,000

Total               $ 525,000            Total                       $ 525,000

Profit and Loss sharing ratio = 3:2:5

Proceeds from sale of assets = $275,000

Loss from sale of non-cash assets = $225,000 ($500,000 - $275,000)

Thus, the amount of the loss from the sale of non-cash assets that would have been allocated to Bevell is $45,000 ($225,000 x 2/10).

Learn more: brainly.com/question/17149203

You might be interested in
Jack works for Red, Blue and Green CPAs. Each year Red, Blue and Green asks Jack to fill out a form indicating all of his financ
sasho [114]

Answer:

1.Immediate Family:

Spouse

Dependent Child

Dependent Parent

Spouse Equivalent

2.Close Relatives:

Sister

Brother

Father

Mother

Grand Father

Independent Child

3.Other Relatives and Friends:

Niece

Nephew

Cousin

Golf Partner

College Friend

Roommate

Explanation:

AICPA code of professional conduct are standards that are followed by CPA professionals.  It is important and necessary for CPA professionals to understand the rules and standard of professional guidance and abide by them. There are two major sections of Code of Professional Conduct:

1. Rules

2. Standards

Rules are enforceable and required to be followed. Standards are the guidance which helps to make decision in certain situations.

8 0
2 years ago
If total liabilities increased by $6,000 and the assets increased by $8,000 during the accounting period, what is the change in
Usimov [2.4K]
The owner has $2,000 more in assets. therefor the equity increased by 2,000
6 0
3 years ago
Do the following activities contribute to US GDP in 2020? Explain why or why not? In which year do these activities contribute t
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

Explained below.

Explanation:

In option (a) no it does not contribute to the US GDP in any year. The transaction appears in expenditure as an increase in consumption and a decrease in net exports that offset. According to option (b) yes it contributes to US GDP in 2013. The transaction appears as an increase in investment (increase in inventory). In 2014, the transaction appears as an increase in net exports offset by a decrease in investment. According to option (c), the transaction appears in expenditure as an increase in consumption in 2014 offset by a decrease in net exports. Option (d) represents the transaction appears as an increase in investment (increase in inventory). In 2014, the transaction appears as an increase in consumption offset by a decrease in investment. According to option (e) yes, it contributes $1000 to US GDP in 2014. The $6000 purchase price exceeds the price paid by the used car dealer. The difference represents value added by the dealership - this is a service that should be counted as part of GDP.

8 0
3 years ago
I have a fallacious argument is one that is based on
12345 [234]

a fallacious argument would be one that is based on fallacies or disagreements

7 0
3 years ago
PureSource Pharma Inc. recently acquired BioChem Pharmaceuticals Inc. It now sells its own products along with the products orig
Licemer1 [7]

Answer: Puresource Pharma would have to reduce it's cost

Explanation:

Horizontal integration could be defined as the merge between two or more companies that carry out similar functions or market in production.

Puresource Pharma would have to reduce it's cost of product and either sell below or same cost as their acquired company's product. This would help promote her market and would give a monopoly for them for the market for both of them.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Martin's cleaning supplies company has an idea for a cleaner that is universal and can clean any surface type. this could simpli
    11·1 answer
  • Why is it important for business to know exchange rates?
    9·1 answer
  • This year, the annual tuition at a public four-year university is $5,290. Next year when Jarrod attends his first year, the tuit
    7·2 answers
  • Hylands is admitted to the partnership of Reddick & Nole. Prior to her admission, the partnership books show Reddick's capit
    11·1 answer
  • Laura and Martin obtain a 20​-year, ​$150 comma 000 conventional mortgage at 10.0​% on a house selling for ​$170 comma 000. Thei
    12·1 answer
  • Suppose that a company needs 1,500,000 items during a year and that preparation for each production run costs $900. Suppose also
    10·1 answer
  • A bond will sell at a premium (above par value) ifA) the market value of the bond is greater than the discount rate of the bond.
    13·1 answer
  • When standard direct labor hours differ from actual direct labor hours used, the company experienced a(n):
    10·1 answer
  • Information of Company X:
    15·1 answer
  • An IRS category of corporation that is treated like a partnership for tax purposes, avoiding taxation of corporate profits and s
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!