Answer:
Naturalistic observation, interviews, and case studies
Explanation:
Three of the most common research methods are naturalistic observation, interviews, and case studies. Each one of them brings something different to the table:
- Naturalistic observation refers to studying subjects directly on their environment without any intervention from the researcher. This is a great method because watching people behave in a natural way will be very revealing and more truthful. When subjects know they are being observed, they often change their behaviour. Naturalistic observation thus requires the observer to be as anonymous and invisible as possible.
- An interview is a research method where the subject is asked to answer to some specific questions crafted by the researcher. Interviews allow the researchers have a much closer look at the subject, trying to ascertain the motives behind their behaviour. However, a problem with interviews is that the subjects often time won't respond truthfully, but will adjust their answers to what is expected from them.
- A case study is a method that goes more in depth than the other two, and the researcher tries to learn as much as possible about the subject through a variety of other methods, like observations, interviews, surveys, etc. Case studies are much thorough and deeper investigations, but they can be very time consuming, and require a subject that is willing to facilitate the work of the researcher, which isn't always possible.
"<em>Brown v. Board of Education</em>reversed the court ruling of <em>Plessey v. Ferguson."</em>
I believe the answer is: No, depressed people in Eastern cultures do not devalue themselves like depressed people in Western cultures.
Eastern culture place a really high value on hardwork more than the western culture. So, people in eastern culture tend to see the act of succumbing to depression as being weak, which make them tend to deal it by working even harder to accomplish positive in life.
Answer:
Political party.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, having the information of an individual's identification with a particular political party is very important in order for the voter to analyze the candidate and form opinions about them. For example, if a voter is trying to pick between two candidates, he or she will most likely pick the one that has the most affiliation with his or her political party.
