Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Opposite (or in The US, vertical) angles are congruent.
Adjacent ( on the same line) angles are supplementary (that is their sum = 180 degrees).
Answer:
No DB is not a perpendicular bisector of AC
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because as AC is a straight line it's angle degree is 180 which when bisected by DB becomes,
180 ÷ 2 = 90
On both the angles i.e <BDC = <NDA = 90°
To make it a perpendicular bisector but
<BDC is not equal to <NDA is not equal to 90°.
Hence, DB is not a perpendicular bisector of line AC.
Answer: b.not enough info
Step-by-step explanation:
Corresponding angles of congruent triangles are congruent, so 
However, we don't have all 3 interior angles of either triangle, so we cannot conclude anything.
Answer:
Q1. x= 18, y=59
Q2. m∠J= 56°
Step-by-step explanation:
Q1. (3x +5)°= y° (base ∠s of isos. △)
y= 3x +5 -----(1)
(3x +5)° +y° +(4x -10)°= 180° (∠ sum of △)
3x +5 +y +4x -10= 180
7x +y -5= 180
7x +y= 180 +5
7x +y= 185 -----(2)
Substitute (1) into (2):
7x +3x +5= 185
10x= 185 -5
10x= 180
x= 180 ÷10
x= 18
Substitute x= 18 into (1):
y= 3(18) +5
y= 59
Q2. (5x -13)°= (3x +17)° (base ∠s of isos. △)
5x -13= 3x +17
5x -3x= 17 +13
2x= 30
x= 30 ÷2
x= 15
∠LKJ
= 3(15) +17
= 62°
∠KLJ= 62° (base ∠s of isos. △)
m∠J
= 180° -62° -62° (∠ sum of △JKL)
= 56°