Answer:
Yes, these facts are valid against Hannah which comes under Ratification Doctrine.
Explanation:
Here in the question its given that Hannah had allowed her friend to lend her computer for a one week period which was during her thanks giving break.
During those times Carol sold that laptop to a friend which was one of them in their class without asking hannah about this.
Now when after the break hannah and carol both return then carol told her that she had sold her laptop because she was getting an amount from the buyer which was too good to pass up so shesold it that moment.
Now when she gave that money to Hannah she instead of scolding her thanked her and her expression was seeming to be like she had done an awsome job for her.
So, based on the facts the contract was valid because it came under Ratification Doctrine.
Answer:
$161 million
Explanation:
Given that,
Gross profit = $350 million
Operating expenses = $120 million
Tax rate = 30%
First, we need to find out the income before taxes by subtracting operating expenses from the gross profit then we are able to determine net income after taxes.
Income before tax:
= Gross profit - Operating expenses
= $350 million - $120 million
= $230 million
Net income after taxes:
= Income before tax - Taxes
= $230 million - (0.30 × $230 million)
= $230 million - $69 million
= $161 million
Answer: Tina doesn't have a standing
Explanation:
From the information given in the question, we are told that Consumer Goods Corporation sells products that are poorly made.
We are further told that Tina, who has never bought a product from Consumer Goods, files a suit against the firm alleging that its products are defective.
The firm could ask for dismissal of the suit on the basis that Tina doesn't have a standing. This is because Tina has never bought their goods before and therefore shouldn't be alleging that the product of the company is bad. Assuming Tina has bought their products before, then it'll have been harder for the firm to ask for dismissal.
Answer:
The value of the stock is $28.57
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Dividend paid at the end of the year, D1 = $2.00 per share
Increase in dividend = $1.50 per share
Growth rate, g = 5% = 0.05
Required rate of return = 12% = 0.12
Now,
Price with constant Dividend Growth model = D1 ÷ ( r - g )
= $2 ÷ ( 0.12 - 0.05 )
= $28.57
Hence,
The value of the stock is $28.57
Answer:
The value of the firm is $1,485,000
Explanation:
For computing the value of the firm, first, we have to compute the price per share which equals to
= Borrowed amount ÷ repurchase shares
= $220,000 ÷ 20,000
= $11 per share
Now, the value of the firm should be computed. The formula is used which is shown below:
= Price per share × Number of outstanding shares
= $11 × 135,000 shares
= $1,485,000
Hence, the value of the firm is $1,485,000
