1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Montano1993 [528]
2 years ago
13

Which country carried out a genocide in world war 1

History
1 answer:
vladimir2022 [97]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Germany...................?????

You might be interested in
Do we live in a Brave New World?
kirill [66]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
How did Beethoven and Rachel communicate
Lelu [443]
He used a notebook to conduct conversations with friends, family and colleagues. That's all I know. I hope it helps!
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did changes in people’s living arrangements caused by the Agricultural Revolution influence the rise of industrialization in
Helga [31]
The Agricultural Revolution was a result of increased labor and agricultural productivity. This, in turn, resulted to the increase in output of food supply faster than the increase in population. Since there were more food available, more people chose to live away from farms and do other jobs that contributed the industrial revolution.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was a natural resource needed for the industrial revolution from the United States
serious [3.7K]
You didn’t upload a picture of possible answers! However, coal and steel were one the biggest resources used in the industrial revolution.
5 0
2 years ago
Plz answer these two questions
topjm [15]
After the Cold War ended, promoting the international spread of democracy seemed poised to replace containment as the guiding principle of U.S. foreign policy. Scholars, policymakers, and commentators embraced the idea that democratization could become America's next mission. In recent years, however, critics have argued that spreading democracy may be unwise or even harmful. This paper addresses this debate. It argues that the United States should promote democracy and refutes some of the most important arguments against U.S. efforts to spread democracy. After a brief discussion of definitions of democracy and liberalism, the paper summarizes the reasons why the spread of democracy— especially liberal democracy— benefits the citizens of new democracies, promotes international peace, and serves U.S. interests. Because the case for democratization is rarely made comprehensively, the paper explicates the arguments for why democracy promotes liberty, prevents famines, and fosters economic development. The logic and evidence of a democratic peace are also summarized, as are the ways in which U.S. security and economic interests would be advanced in a world of democracies. These benefits to U.S. interests include a reduction in threats to the United States, fewer refugees attempting to enter the United States, and better economic partners for American trade and investment. The paper then turns to a rebuttal of four prominent recent arguments against the benefits of spreading democracy: (1) the claim that the democratic peace is a myth; (2) the argument that the process of democratization increases the risk of war; (3) arguments that democratic elections are harmful in societies that are not fully liberal; and (4) claims that "Asian values" can undergird polities based on "soft authoritarianism" that are superior to liberal democracies. The paper argues that these recent critiques of U.S. efforts to promote democracy have not presented a convincing case that spreading democracy is a bad idea. The internationa spread of democracy will offer many benefits to new democracies and to the United States. The democratic peace proposition appears robust, even if scholars need to continue to develop multiple explanations for why democracies rarely, if ever, go to war. The evidence on whether democratization increases the risk of war is mixed, at best, and policies can be crafted to minimize any risks of conflict in these cases. The problem of "illiberal democracy" has been exaggerated; democratic elections usually do more good than harm. The United States should, however, aim to promote liberal values as well as electoral democracy. And the "soft authoritarian" challenge to liberal democracy was not persuasive, even before the Asian economic turmoil of 1997 and 1998 undermined claims for the superiority of "Asian values." These are one of the reasons why they should promote democracy aboard
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which statement best describes religions in the Middle East before the idea of monotheism became popular?
    12·2 answers
  • What does it mean for the government to have enumerated powers?
    9·1 answer
  • How did members of parliament respond to James ll’s attempts to enlarge his army and support Catholics ? A) A group of members i
    5·1 answer
  • What forms of protest did the colonists use to oppose British policies?
    9·2 answers
  • Why do people who live on islands tend to develop very different customs from those who live in other parts of the world?
    12·1 answer
  • When it cam to racial beliefs, hitter believed that Germans were
    6·2 answers
  • Which nutrient is the most difficult to break down and, thus, is generally used last for energy in the body?
    10·2 answers
  • What different types of technology brought about changes to farming in Texas after the Civil War era. List at least three differ
    11·1 answer
  • An examination of American voters in the late nineteenth century reveals:________.
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT true about Sumerians?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!