1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bija089 [108]
3 years ago
11

27. In 1950, the world grain production was approximately 600 million tons. In 1994, the world grain harvest had risen to 1800 m

illion tons. In 1995, it fell to 1600 million tons. Calculate the percentage increase in grain production over the period 1950-1995.
Advanced Placement (AP)
1 answer:
IgorLugansk [536]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

166.67%

Explanation:

The computation of the percentage increase in grain production for the period 1950-1955 is shown below:

= (Year 1995 grain production - Year 1950 grain production) ÷ ( Year 1950 grain production)

= (1,600 million tons - 600 million tons) ÷ (600 million tons)

= 1,000 million tons ÷ 600 million tons

= 166.67%

Hence the increase in percentage is 166.67%

You might be interested in
The distance the piston must travel from tdc to bdc is referred to as the _______ of the engine.
Troyanec [42]
C. Stroke if I'm not mistaken.

Good luck!
7 0
3 years ago
A psychologist conducted a study at her home during an annual activity of children wearing masks and going door-to-door receivin
klasskru [66]

Graph is attached.

Answer:

a) The number of children who took extra candy can be said to be the operational definition of the dependent variable here.

(The dependent variable is defined as the variable that is tested by the experimenter. The outcome of dependent variable depends on the independent variable).

b) The psychologist hypotheses are :

H1 : The children would take more candy when they were alone.

H2: The children would take more candy when they were masked.

The data does not in anyway support the hypothesis 1 of the psychologist because from the graph the percentage of children who took candy when alone was low.

The data fully supports the hypothesis 2. From the graph we could denote the percentage of children who colected additional candy when masked was higher.

c) The findings cannot be generalized to all children because only children from the psychologist's neighborhood was used in the experiment.

d) This study is not a naturalistic behaviour because the psychologist is manipulating a variable. Therefore we cannot call this study a naturalistic behaviour.

e) Modeling: Here the children's behaviour may be influenced because they may try to imitate what other children did. A child may take additional candy because another chid took additional candy.

Deindividuation: In this case, the children may feel a loss of identity or anonymous because they are in group. They may take extra candy because they feel anonymous.

From the graph, we could see the percentage of children in group who took extra candy was higher than the percentage of chidren alone who took extra candy.

Lawrence Kohlberg’s preconventional stage: A child's behaviour may be influenced by his self interest to gain reward. This may make the child not collect extra candy.

This Lawrence Kohlberg’s preconventional stage may also influence the behaviour of the children as the children may also be afraid of punishment, which may result in them not collecting extra candy

6 0
3 years ago
Does photosynthesis require carbon dioxide and water as reactants
Nikitich [7]
Yes you do need carbon dioxide and water
5 0
3 years ago
Explain what indications an analysis of a postmortem forebrain can reveal about an individual’s cognitive ability.
Serhud [2]
When we compare animals to one another there<span> is a </span>correlation between<span> relative</span>brain size<span> and performance on </span>intelligence<span> tests. But we have to consider body </span>size<span>, because large animals need larger </span>brains<span> to monitor and run their large organs and higher number of nerve endings.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
"The thunder boomed in the distance as the wind swished through the trees."
Travka [436]

Answer:

onomatopoeia

Explanation:

this is onomatopoeia because this is a figure of speech in which words evoke the actual sound of the thing the refer to or describe ex: the boom of the firework exploding

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following should employers do actively to prevent workplace hazards
    14·1 answer
  • If personal income increases,
    13·1 answer
  • What did the disciples do wrong according to the Pharisees
    11·1 answer
  • Whats the process called when sugar is broken down without oxygen?
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    7·1 answer
  • Here is my dog my cousin is holding her
    12·1 answer
  • How did Islamic values similar to those expressed in the sources contribute to advancements in the field of science?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following best explains how the historical situation in which Li Zhisui wrote his biography of Mao Zedong influence
    14·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELPP
    12·2 answers
  • What is meaning of pin point . no spam​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!