Answer:In middle school, Tyray had learned to use his size to intimidate people he didn't like. Sometimes, he impressed his friends by forcing smaller boys to give him money or do his homework. Other times, he 1 Page 2 t h reatened kids for fun. At Bluford , Tyray's reputation continued to grow.
Explanation:
Answer:
Use of determiner pronouns, "which," "who," "whose," and "where" in subordinate sentences:
1. which
2. who
3. which
4. which
5. which
6. who
7. whose
8. where
Explanation:
Thus, the attached passage can be filled with the above pronouns as follows:
"A wild sheep chase" is the extraordinary novel (0) WHICH brought its author, Haruki Murakami, to public attention. The book, (1) __which____ is set in Japan, begins simply enough. A young man (2) ___who____ works for an advertisement agency gets a postcard from a friend. He decides to use the postcard, (3) ___which_____ shows a photo of a country scene, for an advertisement (4) ___which______ his company is making. However, he doesn't notice that in the photo there is a sheep (5) ___which______ has a star on its back. This photo attracts the attention of a strange man in black, (6) __who______ offers him a choice – find the sheep or lose everything. The search for the sheep takes the main character, (7) __whose______ name is never revealed, from Tokyo to the mountains of northern Japan, (8) ___where_____ he has to face a number of dangers.
Replacement of a word with another changes the meaning of the sentence if the words used are not synonyms. So, if we replaced the word "versatility" with the synonym "functionality," this sentence will change in the sense that;
- The connotation of functionality implies a working tool, while versatility implies more than one use.
A functionality implies a tool that is used for a specific purpose. Versatility connotes the idea of being used for several purposes.
So, replacing the word versatility with functionality will lay more emphasis on the working nature of the tool instead of its varied uses.
Therefore, sentence B is a good application.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/22336731
Read the excerpt from the US Supreme court case Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).
The statute of Louisiana, acts of 1890, c. 111, requiring railway companies carrying passengers in their coaches in that State, to provide equal, but separate, accommodations for the white and colored races, by providing two or more passenger coaches for each passenger train, or by dividing the passenger coaches by a partition so as to secure separate accommodations; and providing that no person shall be permitted to occupy seats in coaches other than the ones assigned to them, on account of the race they belong to; and requiring the officer of the passenger train to assign each passenger to the coach or compartment assigned for the race to which he or she belong; and imposing fines or imprisonment upon passengers insisting on going into a coach or compartment other than the one set aide for the race to which he or she belongs; and conferring upon officers of the train power to refuse to carry on the train passengers refusing to occupy the coach or compartment assigned to them, and exempting the railway company from liability for such refusal, are not in conflict with the provisions either of the Thirteenth Amendment or of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
Which best explains why the Supreme Court’s decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was unconstitutional?
Answer:
as a result, because anything else you put wont make sense
