Answer and Explanation:
The situation is an example of classical conditioning. A new behavior was learned because what used to be a neutral stimulus was associated with an unconditioned stimulus. Let's break it down below to better understand it:
- an unconditioned stimulus (UCS) is something that produces a natural reaction in or from us - an unconditioned response (UR). In the given situation, the UCS is the heat. We normally respond to heat by sweating and feeling thirsty. When it is too hot, we may even faint.
- a neutral stimulus (NS) is something that does not necessarily produce a response. In the passage, it is the organ music. We wouldn't normally sweat or faint while listening to organ music.
- Because Jeannette was feeling uncomfortable due to heat while listening to organ music, she ended up associating the two stimuli.
- Now, organ music has become a conditioned stimulus (CS). It now has the power, so to speak. of making her faint even though what originally made her faint was the heat.
- Therefore, fainting is now a conditioned response (CR). Every time Jeanette listens to organ music, she will feel dizzy because of the association explained above.
Answer:
C, I hope this helped if it didn't I am not the best with politics so. I am just thinking C.
Explanation:
Answer:
D. The Response Federal Interagency Operational Plan
Explanation:
How the Federal Government aligns resources and delivers core capabilities to reach our shared National Preparedness Goal is described in, ''The Response Federal Interagency Operational Plan''.
Answer:
Spot announcements
Explanation:
Spot announcement is a brief or small television or radio announcement, usually as an advertisement which is made by a certain individual television station or radio station during the program or after a network program.
It hardly airs for few seconds to minutes. It is shown in between program or by the end of the program.
In the context, Carol saw few commercial advertisement while watching television shows. They are termed as Spot announcements.
Answer:
The EPA can hold Alpha Chemicals liable for the cleanup costs, because it did not conduct appropriate inquiries.
Explanation:
First of all, Alpha Chemicals Inc. was supposed to conduct a contamination test before buying the land as a matter of due diligence. As long as Mantel Corp has been liquidated under the bankruptcy law and hence cannot be held liable as all debts, including the contaminated has been discharged by law. It is the duty of Alpha Chemicals to have all the information about the piece of land before going ahead to buy it. Hence, the EPA will be right to hold Alpha Chemicals liable for the cleanup costs because the appropriate inquiries was not made before acquiring the land.
