Given that, the time (t) taken to complete a journey varies directly as the distance (d) and inversely as the average speed (s).
Hence, we can set an equation as following:
t = k\frac{d}{s}
Other information is that it takes 3 hours to complete a 280km trip at 80km/h.
So, plug in t = 3, d = 280 and s = 80 in the above equation to get the value of k. Therefore,
Divide each sides by 3.5.
k = 0.857142857
So, k = 0.857
Now we need to find the time when d= 546 and s = 65. So, plug in these values in the above equation to get the value of t. Hence,
t = 0.857*\frac{546}{65}
= 0.857 * 8.4
= 7.1988
= 7 hours ( Rounded to nearest integer).
So, it will take 7 hours.
Hope this helps you!
Answer:
love ur prof pic
Step-by-step explanation:
idk
Part A. The correlation coefficient, denotes as R^2, is a measure of how well does the data point correlate with a given model or equation. The closer the R^2 is to 1, the better is the correlation. However, R2=1 is ideal for scatter plots. Using the MS Excel to execute the regression, the data points was fitted to a quadratic equation. The R2=0.9983. From the choices, the closest answer would be 1. But as stated previously, a value of 1 is ideal only. Therefore, the answer is most likely 0.94,
Part B. To determine the slope, the equation would be Δy/Δx. For x=5 and x=10, the slope would be
Slope = (3-1)/(10-5) = 2/5 or 0.4. This is the instantaneous rate of change at the interval of 5 to 10 days.
Part C. The difference between causation and correlation is identifiable if you know the direct relationship between the variables. In this case, the increase in radius is not caused by time. The problem does not state so. But we know from the trend shown on a graph, that there is a correlation between these variables. Therefore, the answer is correlation.
Answer:
did you get the answer yet I have the same question
Answer:
<h3>I hope it helps ❣❣</h3>
.........