John Marshall was the 4th Chief Justice of the Supreme Court who made this decision.
Answers with Explanations:
1. Some people hunt for fish as a form of recreation. Should hunting and fishing be allowed? Should there be different rules for those who hunt and fish for food compared with those who do so for sport? Explain your answers.
Hunting and fishing, as a form of recreation, should be allowed. This allows a person, who is fond in these activities, to relax and to relieve himself from stress. It is one of his rights under the Constitution (the right to pursue what makes him happy). I believe there should be "no" separate rules regarding those who hunt and fish for food to those who do so for sport. Both of these should follow a set of regulations in order to control the number of fishes and animals that can be hunted for food or sport. Separating them is not necessary because both activities threatens the population of fish and animals, thus setting only one set of rules is clear enough to be understood.
2. Snowmobiling, power-boating, and even driving to the cottage contribute to air pollution. Is this okay? Do you think people should be allowed to pollute in order to enjoy nature?
Yes, I believe these activities are okay as long as the vehicles being used are eco-friendly. When it comes to modernization, air pollution is normal, thus people may be allowed to pollute as long as the benefit of polluting the environment outweighs the damages to the nature. Also, regulation of activities is very significant, in order to lessen those which are real or heavy contributors to air pollution. This is also the reason why there is a "Number Coding" on vehicles, in order to lessen traffic and pollution. I believe number coding or other related schemes should also be extended to snowmobiling and power-boating.
They diminished the quantity of votes expected to end a filibuster in the Senate. Filibusters were especially valuable to Southern representatives who tried to piece social equality enactment, including hostile to lynching enactment, until the point that cloture was summoned following a 60 day delay against the Civil Right Act of 1964. In 1975, the Senate lessened the quantity of votes required for cloture from 66% to three-fifths, or 60 of the present one hundred congresspersons.
