1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irga5000 [103]
3 years ago
14

How did the actions of the Paris Commune move the French Revolution to a more radical stage?

History
1 answer:
Sveta_85 [38]3 years ago
5 0
The growing discontent among Paris workers played a huge part in the formation of the Paris Commune. The working-class populace of Paris became far more radicalized and highly politicized at the time, giving them the will to start Commune uprisings.
You might be interested in
Explain MacMillan's conclusion that Wilson "remained a Southerner in some ways all his life." Describe how Wilson's background a
Murljashka [212]

Answer:

paki basa nalng .

Explanation:

On December 4, 1918, the George Washington sailed out of New York with the American delegation to the Peace Conference on board. Guns fired salutes, crowds along the waterfront cheered, tugboats hooted and Army planes and dirigibles circled overhead. Robert Lansing, the American secretary of state, released carrier pigeons with messages to his relatives about his deep hope for a lasting peace. The ship, a former German passenger liner, slid out past the Statue of Liberty to the Atlantic, where an escort of destroyers and battleships stood by to accompany it and its cargo of heavy expectations to Europe.

On board were the best available experts, combed out of the universities and the government; crates of reference materials and special studies; the French and Italian ambassadors to the United States; and Woodrow Wilson. No other American president had ever gone to Europe while in office. His opponents accused him of breaking the Constitution; even his supporters felt he might be unwise. Would he lose his great moral authority by getting down to the hurly-burly of negotiations? Wilson's own view was clear: the making of the peace was as important as the winning of the war. He owed it to the peoples of Europe, who were crying out for a better world. He owed it to the American servicemen. "It is now my duty," he told a pensive Congress just before he left, "to play my full part in making good what they gave their life's blood to obtain." A British diplomat was more cynical; Wilson, he said, was drawn to Paris "as a debutante is entranced by the prospect of her first ball."

Wilson expected, he wrote to his great friend Edward House, who was already in Europe, that he would stay only to arrange the main outlines of the peace settlements. It was not likely that he would remain for the formal Peace Conference with the enemy. He was wrong. The preliminary conference turned, without anyone's intending it, into the final one, and Wilson stayed for most of the crucial six months between January and June 1919. The question of whether or not he should have gone to Paris, which exercised so many of his contemporaries, now seems unimportant. From Franklin Roosevelt at Yalta to Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton at Camp David, American presidents have sat down to draw borders and hammer out peace agreements. Wilson had set the conditions for the armistices which ended the Great War. Why should he not make the peace as well?

Although he had not started out in 1912 as a foreign policy president, circumstances and his own progressive political principles had drawn him outward. Like many of his compatriots, he had come to see the Great War as a struggle between the forces of democracy, however imperfectly represented by Britain and France, and those of reaction and militarism, represented all too well by Germany and Austria-Hungary. Germany's sack of Belgium, its unrestricted submarine warfare and its audacity in attempting to entice Mexico into waging war on the United States had pushed Wilson and American public opinion toward the Allies. When Russia had a democratic revolution in February 1917, one of the last reservations that the Allies included an autocracy vanished. Although he had campaigned in 1916 on a platform of keeping the country neutral, Wilson brought the United States into the war in April 1917. He was convinced that he was doing the right thing. This was important to the son of a Presbyterian minister, who shared his father's deep religious conviction, if not his calling.

Wilson was born in Virginia in 1856, just before the Civil War. Although he remained a Southerner in some ways all his life in his insistence on honor and his paternalistic attitudes toward women and blacks he also accepted the war's outcome. Abraham Lincoln was one of his great heroes, along with Edmund Burke and William Gladstone. The young Wilson was at once highly idealistic and intensely ambitious. After four very happy years at Princeton and an unhappy stint as a lawyer, he found his first career in teaching and writing. By 1890 he was back at Princeton, a star member of the faculty. In 1902 he became its president, supported virtually unanimously by the trustees, faculty and students.

6 0
2 years ago
What three events resulted in United States forces intervening in latin American goverment
kozerog [31]
1. Germany threatened to invade
2. Mexicans
3. Filipinos
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these would be considered cultural?
valentina_108 [34]
D, the folklore of a country
5 0
3 years ago
How does the building of tenochtitlan demonstrate aztecs success?
Pani-rosa [81]

Answer:

The Building of Tenochtitlan About 1325, the Aztecs began building a capital city on the island in Lake Texcoco. They called the new capital Tenochtitlan (tay»nohch«teet»LAHN). In some ways the place said to be chosen by Huitzilopochtli was a good one. Having water all around made the island city easy to defend against attack.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did George Wahington’s presidency unintentionally lead to the rise of political parties?
zubka84 [21]

Answer:

In his farewell address, Washington warned about spiritual party, but the people ignored it and continued to have strong believes in there parties.

Explanation:

sorry if this does not help

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How successful was hitler during his conquests of Europe (Blitzkrieg)
    6·2 answers
  • ___ believed that if a person found and achieved his functions in life he would be truly.
    13·2 answers
  • Why did riots break out in dozens of U.S. cities in the late 1960's?
    14·1 answer
  • Who was the African-American who called the war with Mexico disgraceful and cruel? Why?
    12·1 answer
  • Que excusa utilizo estados unidos para intervención en norteamerica?​
    11·1 answer
  • Please answer quickly!!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • What do the Louisiana Purchase and the Mexican Cession have in common with Manifest Destiny?
    5·2 answers
  • Please do this history diagram now, its little
    8·2 answers
  • What is a corporation?
    11·1 answer
  • How did King Wu build support from the people after seizing control?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!