Explanation: Thoreau was a philosopher, writer and devotee of nature. His philosophy was based on independence, freedom of mind. He felt that the government was restricting people from taking care of themselves, their needs. He was not an anarchist but believed in minimal, almost no governmental restrictions.
He considered the rule of the majority is not good, because it implied the compulsion of having to go with the group and follow the rules of the group, which was restrictive for him. The only obligation, according to Thoreau, was to follow his conscience. That way, he would only do what he thought was right, and he would be obliged to do only what was right.
The answer is a numeral system
Answer:
She did not choose a suitable time and place to address the conflict.
Explanation:
Conflict management is the process by which two or more parties resolve differences between them.
They need to dialogue and express their misgivings in the situation so that an equitable solution can be agreed upon.
In the given instance Diane has become concerned that Gretchen is eating the majority of the groceries, but still only paying for half.
This is a conflict that needed to be resolve. However she brought up the discussion when they are at the grocery store checkout and Gretchen asks Diane to pay for her half.
Diane should have brought up the discussion before they came to the store.
So she did not choose a suitable time and place to address the conflict.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the first choice or letter A. The trade barrier is an example of an embargo.
An embargo<span> (from the Spanish </span>embargo<span>, meaning hindrance, obstruction, etc. in a general sense, a trading ban in trade terminology and literally "distraint" in juridic parlance) is the partial or complete prohibition of commerce and trade with a particular country or a group of countries.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly.
Answer: 1. Could Tony have done otherwise than to commit his crimes?
Ans= YES.
2. Should he be held responsible for his actions?
Ans= YES.
3. Why?
Ans= Tony was brought up by his parents to the best of their abilities according to the passage. For every human being, there is always a point where you have the ability to make decisions that would determine your outcome in life, in the case of Tony he would have been opportuned to become something better but he decided to continue to tread the path which he did. If he had decided to be something else, he would have achieved it.
Lastly, according to the passage above Tony made a statement "he joked that he would return to fill out an application for the soon to be vacant manager position", this is to show he was not remorseful about his evil deed. So therefore, he should be held responsible for his actions.
Explanation:
