Jaime is incorrect, the angle does not depend on the radius of the circles.
<h3>Is Jaime correct?</h3>
Remember that an angle that defines an arc on a circle, does not depend on the radius of the circle.
So, if we have an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 3 inches and an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 6 inches, these two angles are exactly the same thing.
The radius of the circle only has an impact on the length of the arc defined by the angle.
So Jaime is clearly incorrect.
If you want to learn more about angles:
brainly.com/question/17972372
#SPJ1
In order to make a 3-dimensional object into a 4-dimensional object, it's important to draw the 4-dimensional shape in a way that gives the illusion of the 3-dimensional object.
<h3>How to illustrate the information?</h3>
It should be noted that shapes play an important part in geometry.
Here, to make a 3-dimensional object into a 4-dimensional object, it's important to draw the 4-dimensional shape in a way that gives the illusion of the 3-dimensional object.
Also, it should be noted that a 4D tesseract can be used to project the image.
Learn more about shapes on:
brainly.com/question/25965491
#SPJ1
Answer:
Yes because 5^2 + 12^2 = 13^2
Step-by-step explanation:
We can check using the Pythagorean theorem
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
5^2 + 12^2 = 13^2
25+ 144= 169
169 = 169
The answer is B because you will cancel the x^5 part on top and bottom and the numerator left 6^3 and denominator left 6
6^3=216divid by 6 you will get 36
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
The number line in option C contains the points -4, -1, 1 and 2 correctly plotted.
