Answer:
y= (3/2)x-3
Step-by-step explanation:
We need two points to find the equation of a line. Let's take (2,0) and (4, 3).
In the equation y=mx+b, m represents the slope. To find the slope, we can calculate the change in y/change in x. For (2,0) and (4,3), the change in y is 3-0=3 and the change in x is 4-2=2. Therefore, our slope is 3/2.
Then, in the equation y=mx+b, we can plug 3/2 in for m to get y = (3/2)x+b. To find b, we can plug one point in, such as (2.0), to get 0=(3/2)(2) + b, 0=3+b, and b=-3, making our equation
y= (3/2)x-3
Answer: The angle of elevation is 18.4 degrees (Approximately)
Step-by-step explanation: Please refer to the picture attached for more details.
The pole from top to bottom is 20 feet tall and is depicted as line FB. An observer is standing at a distance of 20 feet from the base of the pole, and that is depicted as line BA. The observer who is at point A looks up to the top of the flagpole at an angle of elevation shown as angle A.
Using angle A as the reference angle, line FB which is 20 feet would be the opposite (facing the reference angle), while line BA which is 60 feet would be the adjacent (that lies between the right angle and the reference angle).
Therefore, to calculate angle A;
Tan A = Opposite/Adjacent
Tan A = 20/60
Tan A = 1/3
Tan A = 0.3333
Checking with your calculator or table of values,
A = 18.4349°
Rounded to the nearest tenth,
A ≈ 18.4°
Answer:
C. 2.0 < t < 2.5
Step-by-step explanation:
time = distance / speed
The circumference of the lake is given by ...
C = πd = 2π miles ≈ 6.28 miles
Then Johanna's time is ...
(6.28 mi)/(3 mi/h) ≈ 2.09 h
This time is in the interval (2, 2.5), so matches choice C.
___
<em>Alternate solution</em>
If we take pi to be 3, then this boils down to ...
2×3/3 = 2 . . . hours
Pi is on the order of 5% more than 3, so her time will be on the order of 5% more than 2 hours, or just above 2, but not as great as 2.5 hours. This sort of estimating can get you to the correct answer without a calculator.
Answer:
Tom's profit is 43,000.
Step-by-step explanation:
For

and

to be inversely proportional, there must be some constant

such that

Given that

when

, it follows that

Then when

, we have