For the numbers in form, convert to polar form:
By DeMoivre's theorem,
For the numbers already in polar form, DeMoivre's theorem can be applied directly:
At second glance, I think the 2s in the last two numbers should also be getting raised to the 3rd and 4th powers:
Height of cone in term of volume is 3V / πr²
<u>Given that;</u>
Volume of cone = (1/3)(πr²h)
<u>Find:</u>
Height of cone
<u>Computation:</u>
We know that;
Volume of cone = (1/3)(πr²h)
We have to calculate height from above given formula.
V = (1/3)(πr²h)
3V = πr²h
3V / πr² = h
So,
Height of cone = 3V / πr²
<em>Height of cone</em> in term of volume = 3V / πr²
Learn more:
brainly.com/question/24193757?referrer=searchResults
My friend have the same problem can you let me know when you find out ? I
Interesting question
Usually when you look at something like that construction, you think that AB has been bisected by PQ and that the two segments are perpendicular. They are perpendicular but nowhere is that stated. So the answer is C because all the other answers are wrong.
PQ is congruent AB is not correct. As long as the arcs are equal and meet above and below AB there is no proof of congruency. In your mind widen the compass legs so that they are wider than AB and redraw the arcs. You get a larger PQ, but it has all the original properties of PQ except size.
PQ is not congruent to AQ. How would you prove conguency? You'd have to put both lines into triangles that can be proved congruent. It can't be done.
The two lines are not parallel. They are perpendicular. That can be proven. They meet at right angles to each other (also provable).