Answer:
dialation
Step-by-step explanation: can i hve brainiliest
Hi there!
We are given the set of ordered pairs below:

1. What is the domain?
- Domain is a set of all x-values in one set of ordered pairs. So what are the x-values that I am talking about? In ordered pairs, we define x and y which both have relation to each others which we can write as (x,y). That's right, the domain is set of all x-values from ordered pairs.
Therefore, we gather only x-values from (x,y). Hence, the domain is {3,2,0,2}. Whoops! Something is not right. As we learn in Set Theory that we don't write the same or repetitive in a set. Hence, <u>t</u><u>h</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u>c</u><u>t</u><u>u</u><u>a</u><u>l</u><u> </u><u>d</u><u>o</u><u>m</u><u>a</u><u>i</u><u>n</u><u> </u><u>i</u><u>s</u><u> </u><u>{</u><u>0</u><u>,</u><u>2</u><u>,</u><u>3</u><u>}</u>
2. What is the range?
- Because domain is set of all x-values. Then what do you think the range is? That's right! The range is <u>s</u><u>e</u><u>t</u><u> </u><u>o</u><u>f</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u>l</u><u>l</u><u> </u><u>y</u><u>-</u><u>v</u><u>a</u><u>l</u><u>u</u><u>e</u><u>s</u><u>.</u> If you got this right before looking up the underlined words then a handclap for you! So how do we find range? Simple, we just do like finding the domain in the Q1, except we gather the y-values in (x,y) instead and make sure that we don't write same number!
Therefore, gather y-values from the ordered pairs. Hence, <u>t</u><u>h</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>r</u><u>a</u><u>n</u><u>g</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>i</u><u>s</u><u> </u><u>{</u><u>-</u><u>2</u><u>,</u><u>-</u><u>1</u><u>,</u><u>1</u><u>,</u><u>2</u><u>}</u>
3. Is the relation a function?
- All functions are relations but not all relations are functions. Function is a set of ordered pairs where <u>d</u><u>o</u><u>m</u><u>a</u><u>i</u><u>n</u><u> </u><u>i</u><u>s</u><u> </u><u>n</u><u>o</u><u>t</u><u> </u><u>r</u><u>e</u><u>p</u><u>e</u><u>t</u><u>i</u><u>t</u><u>i</u><u>v</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>o</u><u>r</u><u> </u><u>i</u><u>n</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>s</u><u>e</u><u>t</u><u>,</u><u> </u><u>t</u><u>h</u><u>e</u><u>r</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>c</u><u>a</u><u>n</u><u>n</u><u>o</u><u>t</u><u> </u><u>b</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>m</u><u>o</u><u>r</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>t</u><u>h</u><u>a</u><u>n</u><u> </u><u>o</u><u>n</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>s</u><u>a</u><u>m</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>v</u><u>a</u><u>l</u><u>u</u><u>e</u><u>.</u> Consider the following relation: (1,1),(1,2) - Oh, looks like in a set of ordered pairs, there are two same domains which make it only a relation, and not a function. On the other hand, (1,1),(2,2) - Looking good! No same or repetitive domain, making it indeed a function.
Consider the domain from Q1 and see if there are two same values of x in a set. Looks like the relation is not a function since there are same x-values which are 2 in a set, making it only a relation. Hence, the relation is not a function.
These are all 3 answers along with an explanation. Let me know if you have any doubts regarding Relations and Functions.
<em>F</em><em>r</em><em>o</em><em>m</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>Q</em><em>1</em><em>'</em><em>s</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>w</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>w</em><em>o</em><em> </em><em>b</em><em>o</em><em>l</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>e</em><em>x</em><em>t</em><em>s</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>p</em><em>l</em><em>e</em><em>a</em><em>s</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>c</em><em>h</em><em>o</em><em>o</em><em>s</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>s</em><em>e</em><em>c</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>b</em><em>o</em><em>l</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>e</em><em>x</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>o</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>w</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em> </em><em>(</em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>w</em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em> </em><em>u</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em>l</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em>)</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>n</em><em>o</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>f</em><em>i</em><em>r</em><em>s</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>(</em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>w</em><em>i</em><em>t</em><em>h</em><em> </em><em>s</em><em>a</em><em>m</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>2</em><em>'</em><em>s</em><em>)</em><em>.</em><em> </em>
Good luck on your assignment, have a nice day!
Lets simplify each one of the rational expressions using the product rule of exponents:

and the quotient rule of exponents:

.
1.

2.

3.

4.
We can conclude that you should pair the rational expressions with their simplest form as follows:



Step-by-step explanation:
4 tubes connected vertically.
each tube is 0.28 meters long.
it does not leave me any other form of interpretation than just to stack the tubes on top of each other.
4×0.28 = 1.12 meters
Answer: The diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other. Steps (a), (b), and (c) outline proof of this theorem. (See Exercise 25 for a particular instance of this theorem.) (a) In the parallelogram OA BC shown in the figure, check that the coordinates of must be (b) Use the midpoint formula to calculate the midpoints of diagonals and (c) The two answers in part (b) are identical. This shows that the two diagonals do indeed bisect each other, as we wished to prove. (FIGURE CAN'T COPY)