No, -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n is not equivalent to -30 - 13n
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us revise the operation of the negative and positive numbers
- (-) + (-) = (-)
- (-) × (-) = (+)
- (-) + (+) = the sign of greatest [(-) if the greatest is (-) or (+) if the greatest is (+)]
- (-) × (+) = (-)
- (-) - (+) = (-)
- (+) - (-) = (+)
∵ The expression is -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n
- Simplify it
∵ 2(3 + 2n) = 2(3) + 2(2n) = 6 + 4n
∴ -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n = -8 - (6 + 4n) + 7n
- Multiply the bracket by (-)
∴ -8 - (6 + 4n) + 7n = -8 - 6 - 4n + 7n
- Add the like terms
∴ -8 - (6 + 4n) + 7n = (-8 - 6) - 4n + 7n
∴ -8 - (6 + 4n) + 7n = -14 + 3n
∴ -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n is equivalent to -14 + 3n
∵ -14 + 3n ≠ -30 - 13n
∴ -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n is not equivalent to -30 - 13n
No, -8 - 2(3 + 2n) + 7n is not equivalent to -30 - 13n
Learn more:
You can learn more about the directed numbers in brainly.com/question/10364988
#LearnwithBrainly
Answer:
14
Step-by-step explanation:
When you plug this expression into the calc, you should get 14 as your answer.
Answer:
The correct option is;
D. x = -1.38 and 0.82
Please find attached the combined function chart
Step-by-step explanation:
The given equation is x³ + 3 = -x⁴ + 4
Plotting the equation using Excel, we have;
f(x) = x³ + 3, h(x) = -x⁴ + 4
x f(x) h(x)
-1.4 0.256 0.1584
-1.39 0.314381 0.26699
-1.38 0.371928 0.373261
-1.37 0.428647 0.477246
-1.36 0.484544 0.57898
Which shows an intersection at the point around -1.38
x f(x) h(x)
0.77 3.456533 3.64847
0.78 3.474552 3.629849
0.79 3.493039 3.610499
0.8 3.512 3.5904
0.81 3.531441 3.569533
0.82 3.551368 3.547878
0.83 3.571787 3.525417
Which shows the intersection point around 0.82
Therefore, the correct option is x = -1.38 and 0.82
From the graphing calculator the intersection point is given as
x = -1.3802775691 and 0.81917251339.
X^2 + y^2 - x^2 +y^2
That would be (1x+1y)-(1x+1y)
