Answer:I thinks it’s A but I’m not sure update me on what it is if not. A
Explanation:
*A. Derogatory and hostile Correct! The correct answer is: Derogatory and hostile.
It was called the Weimer Republic. It was a democratic republic resembling (somewhat) the same sort of government the United States has. It failed for a number of reasons.
The first and most important was that the German population felt they had been sold down the drain. They felt that their government had failed them the moment the Versailles treaty was signed. There were many riots and uprisings that happened during the Republic. It was chaotic in Germany and unstable.
This anger that people felt had all the earmarks of "DO SOMETHING" and do it now. That psychology led to the rise of Hitler, although it was slow in coming. The treaty of Versailles had to be rewritten a couple of times simply because Germany was not paying. The terms were just too steep, but even if they were much more lenient, it wouldn't have made much difference. Germany was just too angry internally.
I would pick the last one, but it is awfully simplistic.
was one of the major participants in the Seven Years' War which lasted between 1754 and 1763. Britain emerged from the war as the world's leading colonial power, having gained a number of new territories at the Treaty of Paris in 1763 and established itself as the world's pre-eminent naval power.
The war started poorly for Britain, which suffered many deaths from the plague and scurvy, and at the hands of France in North America during 1754–55; and in the loss of Menorca in 1756. The same year Britain's major ally Austria switched sides and aligned itself with France; and Britain was hastily forced to conclude a new alliance with Frederick the Great's Prussia. For the next seven years these two nations were ranged against a growing number of enemy powers led by France. After a period of political instability, the rise of a government headed by the Duke of Newcastle and William Pitt the elder provided Britain with firmer leadership, enabling it to consolidate and achieve its war aims.
In 1759 Britain enjoyed an Annus Mirabilis, "year of miracles", with success over the French on the continent (Germany), in North America (capturing the capital of New France), and in India. In 1761 Britain also came into conflict with Spain. The following year British forces captured Havana and Manila, the western and eastern capitals of the Spanish Empire, and repulsed a Spanish invasion of Portugal. By this time the Pitt-Newcastle ministry had collapsed, Britain was short of credit and the generous peace terms offered by France and its allies were accepted.
Through the crown, Britain was allied to the Electorate of Hanover and Kingdom of Ireland, both of which effectively fell under British military command throughout the war. It also directed the military strategy of its various colonies around the world including British America. In India British possessions were administered by the East India Company.
Answer:
This question is incomplete. Here is the complete question:
After reading a novel set and written during the English Civil War, you are tasked with writing a literary criticism of the work. Which approach would be the most fitting?
A. Reader-response
B. Biographical
C. Ecocriticism
D. New Historicism
Explanation:
The correct answer is option D. New Historicism.
Neohistoricism follows the idea that a text should be considered as something that comes from a time, place, and from the way it was written, and not as a specific type of text.
Here an attempt was made to understand a history from its provenance, the time in which it developed, understanding the culture from which it comes and an intellectual analysis through literature.
Given this information, we can say that the correct answer is option D.
