This is definitely my question I want to be a officer when I grow up, I'm studying many aspects of it.
there's no specific case in mind but there were these too officers that tried to negotiate in a hostage situation in Dallas Texas and the hostage tooker told the officers to put their gun on the floor as he has another officer hostage, they do it and the officer gets shot in his face and shoots the other officers and they were injured, it was deadly force due to it being a dang hostage situation
The people of Georgia cannot propose legislation because Georgia's amendment makes no clause for popular initiative and only allows the State legislature to propose legislation
.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Legislative jurisdiction can be transferred to any branch of government under the framework of separation of powers by the legislature, and while citizens in Georgia actually are independent, legislative power cannot be allocated to the state.
Because the constitution of Georgia does not provide for common proposals and only requires a request for legislation by the General Assembly
In fact, the legislation approved by the legislature cannot be contingent on future authorization or adoption by electors at the State elections in the absence of a legal provision that allows for a public referral.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. In assessing the tort of defamation, the courts must seek a balance between the right to protect one's reputation with the rights afforded under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
Explanation:
The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States guarantees, among other rights, the right to freedom of expression, that is, the freedom of citizens to express their opinions without censorship or punishment for it.
But this right, like all civil rights, has limits. These limits are precisely the rights of other citizens. Therefore, if a person's freedom of expression constitutes defamation, he would be violating the right of another citizen and, consequently, exceeding his powers.
Therefore, the courts must verify that there is a balance between both rights, or that the freedom of expression does not exceed what is guaranteed by the First Amendment, since otherwise a crime would be committed against the honor of the other person.