1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Reil [10]
3 years ago
5

The following question has two parts. First, answer part A. Then, answer part B.

Mathematics
2 answers:
Pie3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

When you're talking factors, you're talking about some sort of integer; that's because “factors” depends on the concept of divisibility, which are virtually exclusive to integers. When you're talking “greater than”, you're excluding complex numbers (where the concept of ordering doesn't exist) and you're probably assuming positive integers. If you are, then no; no positive integer has factors that are larger than it.

If you go beyond positive numbers, that changes. 0 is an integer, and has every integer, except itself, as factors; since its positive factors are greater than zero, there are factors of zero that are greater than zero. If you extend to include negative numbers, you always have both positive and negative factors; and since all positive integers are greater than all negative integers, all negative integers have factors that are greater than them.

Beyond zero, though, no integer has factors whose magnitudes are greater than its own. And that's a principle that can be extended even to the complex integers

Step-by-step explanation:

OleMash [197]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Look below

Step-by-step explanation:

Part A.

Martina is correct. This is because all even numbers have 2 as a factor.

We can use 2 to find the other factor. Let's use x to represent the other factor. We can set up an equation:

2x=62

Divide both sides by 2

x=31

The missing factor is 31

Part B.

Lucas is wrong. This is because a number cannot be both prime and composite.

A prime numbers' only factors are 1 and itself

A composite number has more than 2 factors.

If 15 was both prime and composite, Lucas is contradicting himself because having 2 factors and more than 2 factors at the same time is not possible.

We can also prove him wrong because...

15: 1, 3, 5, 15

Has more than 2 factors (it has 4 factors) therefore it is composite.

You might be interested in
The graph shows two lines, A and B.
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer with explanation:

<u>Part A: </u>

One solution.

The number of points of intersection represents the number of solutions. Since the two lines only intersect at one point, there is only one solution.

<u>Part B:</u>

(3, 4)

The point(s) of intersection marks the solution(s) to the lines. Since lines A and B intersect at the point (3, 4), the solution to the equation of their lines is (3, 4), or x=3, y=4, as coordinates are written as (x, y).

3 0
3 years ago
Justify each step of this inequality by stating the property that was used to get to each step.
Allushta [10]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

step 1 simplified like terms -11k +3k =8k

step 2 incorrect should be -4k -20 on the left side distributive property

step 3 added 8k to each side

step 4 added 20 to each side

step 5 divided each side by 4

6 0
3 years ago
If i have 45 pen is ;) and 90 coins how much is that total
Delicious77 [7]

Answer:

40.90

Step-by-step explanation:

I do not know what pen is but if it is dollars then....

4 0
4 years ago
Please help will mark branlist!!
insens350 [35]

Answer:

x=9

Step-by-step explanation:

Looking at the diagram, we see that four angles are formed by the intersection of two lines. The angles highlighted in blue and green are therefore, vertical angles. We know that vertical angles have equal angle measures meaning that in this case, the measure of the blue angle is equal to the measure of the green angle. Using this, we can now solve for x:

7x+49=2x+94

7x-2x=94-49

5x=45

x=45/5

x=9

8 0
3 years ago
A model length of 12 cm. represents an actual length of 102 ft.the model has a width of 48cm. What is the width of the actual ob
Elodia [21]

the answer would be 408


just set it up like this

12       48

----  =  ----

102      ?


12*4=48 so 102*4 = 408

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • SOMEONE HELP ME ASAP I will give BRAINLIEST
    7·1 answer
  • Twelve more than twice a number is three more than eight times a number
    14·1 answer
  • Please help.....25 points!!!
    14·2 answers
  • HELP!
    14·2 answers
  • Use the graphs of the transformed toolkit functions to write a formula for each of the resulting functions.
    15·1 answer
  • Cual es el resultado de efectuar​
    13·1 answer
  • Use the substitution method to solve the system of equations. Enter your
    5·1 answer
  • The estimated regression equation by least squares method minimizes the sum of the Group of answer choices Absolute deviations b
    7·1 answer
  • Consider the quadratic equation ax2 + bx +5 = 0, where a,b, and c are rational numbers and the quadratic has two disticnt zeros.
    15·1 answer
  • Pineapples were packed in three large crates. for each crate, the weight of every pineapple in the crate was recorded. here are
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!