Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
answer what?
Answer:
False. See te explanation an counter example below.
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we need to find:
for all 
and for 
in the Markov Chain assumed. If we proof this then we have a Markov Chain
For example if we assume that 
then we have this:
Because we can only have if we have this:
, from definition given 
With 
we have that 
So based on these conditions 
would be 1 with probability 1/2 from the definition.
If we find a counter example when the probability is not satisfied we can proof that we don't have a Markov Chain.
Let's assume that 
for this case in order to satisfy the definition then 
But on this case that means 
and on this case the probability 
, so we have a counter example and we have that:
for all 
so then we can conclude that we don't have a Markov chain for this case.
Answer:
put one point on (1,1.5) and another on (2,3)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The third option. (the one where it intersects on the y line)
Step-by-step explanation:
If you solve for the system of equations, you will find that it is (0,3), so it intersects on the y line. Additionally, it is on the top because it is positive.
Answer:
"No, the relationship is NOT proportional"
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Complete Question:</u>
Of the 75 boys in the 7th grade class, 25 participate in at least one sport. Of the 120 girls in 7th grade class 30 participate in at least one sport. Is this relationship proportional?
We have to see the ratio of each and if they are equal (after reducing), we can say they are proportional.
Boys:
25 participate in atleast 1 sport and there are total of 75. Hence, ratio is
25 : 75 = 1 : 3
Girls:
30 particiapte in atleast 1 sport and there are toal of 120. hence ratio is:
30 : 120 = 1 : 4
So, the relationship is NOT proportional
