Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
We can calculate for the total stockholders’ equity by using
the formula:
Total stockholders’ equity = Number of Shares * Price per
Share – Deficit Balance
Substituting our given values:
Total stockholders’ equity = 19,000 shares * ($12 / share) - $75,000
Total stockholders’ equity = $153,000
Answer:
be indifferent between the two meals
Explanation:
Marginal utility is the additional satisfaction received from consuming an additional unit of a good or service. Marginal utility is the additional utility derived from consuming one more unit of a good. the consumption decision is to consume more units of a good that gives the higher utility per good.
Marginal utility per good = marginal utility / price of the good
Whopper combo meal = 15 / 3 = 5
a meal at the Embassy Suites = 145 / 29 = 5
both meals have the same marginal utility of 5. She would be indifferent between consuming the two meals
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
Answer:
The retained earning would be debited by ($60,000)
Explanation:
According to the given data we have the following:
Number of shares outstanding=60,000
par value of $5 per share
stock dividend declared=cc
Therefore, to calculate the amount either (debited) or credited to retained earnings we would have to make the followin calculation:
Dividend value=Number of shares outstanding×par value of $5 per share×stock dividend declared
Dividend value=60,000×$5×20%
Dividend value=($60,000)
Therefore, as the dividend paid reduces retained earnings, the retained earning would be debited by ($60,000)
