Answer:
Hand saw is cheaper.
Explanation:
Given:
Material cost = $500
Electric saw cost rent per hour = $20
Building hour from electric saw = 6 hour
Building hour from hand saw = 15 hour
Time off pay from job = $8/hour
Computation of total cost from Electric saw :
Total cost from Electric saw = Material cost + Renting cost of electric saw + Time of from job
Total cost from Electric saw = $500 + (6 × $20) + (6 × $8)
Total cost from Electric saw = $500 + $120 + $48
Total cost from Electric saw = $668
Computation of total cost from hand saw :
Total cost from hand saw = Material cost + Time of from job
Total cost from hand saw = $500 + (15 × $8)
Total cost from hand saw = $500 + $120
Total cost from hand saw = $620
Hand saw is cheaper.
<span>Determining the magnitude of possible losses from a premature death can be complicated. The best method is the <u>needs-based approach.</u>
<u />When it comes to this approach, you are appealing to the immediate needs of the people who are left behind when their loved one dies prematurely. You want to help them by providing them with everything they may need in order to deal with their loss.
</span>
I believe that it is true, here's an example of such a chart.
Answer:
Roper Spring Water should not buy the machine, since it produces a negative net present.
Explanation:
Summary of Cash Flows on the Machine are as follows :
Year 0 = ($230,000)
Year 1 = $55,000
Year 2 = $65,000
Year 3 = $75,000
Year 4 = $75,000
Interest rate = 7%
Using the CFj Function of the Financial calculator this will be computed as :
($230,000) CF j 0
$55,000 CF j 1
$65,000 CF j 2
$75,000 CF j 3
$75,000 CF j 4
i/yr = 7%
Therefore Net Present Value is - $3,385.13
Since this is a negative Net Present Value, Roper Spring Water should not buy the machine.
