Answer:
Probably not, because the terms are not definite.
Explanation:
A contract is considered to be valid when there is a written or expressed agreement for one party to deliver goods or services to another.
The terms are clearly stated. For example the price, time of sale, acceptance of price, and so on.
A valid contract has the following elements: offer, acceptance, agreement, and consideration.
In the given scenario where Kelly tells Matthew that she will sell him one of her motorcycles at some time in the future and Matthew eagerly accepts. There is an agreement but there is no specific offer and consideration of price and also the time of transaction.
So the contract is probably not valid because terms are not clearly defined.
The unemployment rate in this population is 12%
First of all we have to find the total labour force in this country
Children less than 18 + people in the military + people in jail + retirees + marginally attached workers + full time students
= 50million + 15million + 30 million + 10 million + 30 million + 20
= 155 million
Labor force = 280million - 155 million
= 125 million
In this population those working full time and part time are the number of those that are employed.
= 30 million + 80 million
= 110 million
The unemployed = 125 million - 110 million
= 15million
The unemployment rate =
= 0.12
The unemployment rate = 12%
Read more on brainly.com/question/15707932?referrer=searchResults
Answer: Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
A country has a comparative advantage in producing a commodity if the opportunity cost of producing that good is lesser in that country as compared to the other country.
From the information given in the question, it is clear that Alphaland has a comparative advantage in axes and Betaville has a comparative advantage in batons.
Hence, Alphaland will trade axes for batons only if the price of batons is lower than the cost of producing it in Alphaland. So that there is a possibility mutually beneficial trade.
Answer:
1. Relative price = $3
2. Increases
3. affects , not affect
Explanation:
As per the data given in the question,
1) The relative price of a paperback novel in 2016 = Maria,s wage ÷ Price of a paperback novel
= $54÷$18
= $3
2) Between 2011 and 2016, the nominal value increases and the real value of Maria's wage remains the same.
3)Monetary neutrality is proposition that the change in the money supply affects the nominal variables but it does not affect the real variables.
I think that the answer is A but i have no clue i’m so sorry :(
