Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Metacom was killed and the settlers were helped by other tribes.
The correct answer is It was used to breakup companies that brought other companies to eliminate them as competition
Much of the doctrine, in commenting on the historical facts that gave rise to the Sherman Act, often states that the United States, in the late nineteenth century, was witnessing the emergence of large monopolies and cartels in various sectors of the economy, which were abusing their market power and consequently harming consumers.
Answer:
Cultural performances
Explanation:
Cultural performances are usually described as being interactional, contextual, episodic, and improvisational. It has to do with those events that happen everyday. It is the perpetual display of the values of a culture.
This would include a series of events such as festivals, storytelling, parades.
In 1763, France<span>, </span>Britain<span>, and Spain signed the Treaty of Paris at the end of the </span>French and Indian War<span>. As part of the treaty, </span>France<span> gave up almost all of its land in North America and Spain gave up </span>Florida<span>. ... The </span>British divided Florida into two<span> </span>distinct coloniescolonies<span> with the Apalachicola River as the boundary.</span><span />
